Connect with us

Twitter Takes Unbelievable Action Against Triple Amputee Over His $16Mil Wall Fundraiser



There’s probably no end to worthy causes in this country that need funds to succeed and rely on generous donators to provide that. It doesn’t diminish the importance of any other cause to raise money for one and not the other. Nobody can raise money for all causes at one, but Americans concerned with something they are particularly passionate about can certainly start a fund to solve an issue near to them.

Instead, leftists’ biggest issue with raising money to protect our southern border and thus make America safer for all citizens in this nation, seems to be the misguided argument of why the effort isn’t being directed at homelessness or anything else they pull out of their pocket for sake of argument.

Worse, are those who don’t want money for the Wall at all and take action against those who are rightfully raising money for a worthy cause, without being divisive, bigoted, and certainly not racist.

Although the Twitter platform is supposedly a platform for free expression and sharing of ideas, that’s really not the case since the administrators and owners seem to control the narrative and what’s shared on their platform. #WeFundTheWall campaign head, Brian Kolfage, who is a triple amputee war hero, has used Twitter to bring attention to the cause, as is his right, considering it’s a worthwhile and legitimate fundraiser, which has become explosively successful. However, free speech has been denied to this citizen who sacrificed three limbs for our rights.

Want to build the wall NOW? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter and Instagram!

As dangerous “information gods” over the universe, Twitter and Facebook, only let the world see what the owners personally deem important. Controlling a narrative like this is directly against the right to free speech that every single citizen is given, but as private businesses, they affect democracy however they see fit.

It would seem that the massively popular GoFundMe account for the border wall, proving the mass majority of American citizens support it, would be a positive post on the Twitter platform. Instead, it’s not a cause they agree with, so they appear to have taken action against the petition for the wall, as to directly affect the outcome of this campaign in an egregious way.

Here’s proof:

We the people deserved to be heard and the social media monopoly in our country must be fair or held accountable. If they continue to get away with this unprecedented amount of censorship, America will no longer be America again.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

Pompeo on Huawei: Won’t put American information at risk



Continue Reading

Kamala Just Made Shocking Sudden Border Announcement – Beto & Gillibrand Panicking



As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Daily Caller

Democratic California Sen. Kamala Harris refuted two of her potential 2020 presidential primary challengers on Wednesday when she stated that she does not agree with their acceptance of open borders.

“No, I believe that we need border security,” Harris told “The Daily Show’s” Trevor Noah when asked how she felt about former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke’s call to remove the already standing wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

“We need smart border security. We can’t have open borders, we need to have border security, all nations do,” she continued. “All nations define their borders, but we should not have a policy and perspective that is grounded in keeping people out for the sake of this nationalistic kind of thing this president is trying to push.”


O’Rourke has long argued against a border wall, despite still claiming to be against open borders. Following President Donald Trump’s executive order in September to erect an 18-foot steel bollard wall to replace the existing pedestrian fencing in El Paso, Texas, the Democrat called the existing chain-link fence “bad enough.”

The failed senatorial candidate later revealed to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that if he could snap his fingers and make his hometown of El Paso’s border wall disappear, he “absolutely” would. O’Rourke insisted in the past that the way to improve border safety and security is to “ensure that we are maximizing the potential from everyone … [and] treating each other with respect and dignity” and referred to Trump’s wall as an “expression of our smallness, our meanness, our fear to the rest of the world.”

Want to build the wall NOW? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter and Instagram!

Democratic New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who launched a presidential exploratory committee in January, signaled her support for tearing down the existing barrier on the border when she was confronted with O’Rourke’s position.

“Well, I’d have to ask folks in that part of the of the country to see whether the fencing that exists today is helpful or unhelpful,” Gillibrand replied in February when asked about O’Rourke’s comments. “But, you know, Democrats are not afraid of national security or border security.”

“And [the wall] is a hateful message. I mean [Trump’s] trying to create a picture of division and hate and derision. And that’s what I’m so offended by — the fact that he’s fused this kind of racism in, ‎in his words and actions is just troubling,” she continued. “So, I could look at it and see which part he means and why and if it makes sense I could support it.”

Neither Gillibrand nor O’Rourke have officially entered the 2020 presidential race.

Want to build the wall NOW? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter and Instagram!

Read more on Daily Caller

Continue Reading
[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend