Connect with us

Sudden Turn Of Events: Feinstein Sealing FBI Investigation from Public As Allegations Collapse



Just keep repeating to yourself: The darkness hates the light, the darkness hates the light…

That would seem to be the lesson from the latest turn in the Democrats’ scheme to annihilate Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, his family and Republican hopes for a more constitutionally framed U.S. high court.

Over at YoungConservatives, Nick Arama writes:

“Sen. Dianne Feinstein just made a move that shows how hypocritical the Democrats can be after all this drama.

“Democrats have gone out of their way to throw all kinds of dirt at Judge Kavanaugh in the hopes that something would stick and they’d be able to stop his confirmation … [T]hey were all about disruption, delay and ‘Spartacus’ moments … [and] the letter from Christine Blasey Ford, dropping it at the last minute to delay the first vote.

“Then as the allegations remained uncorroborated, they started to move the goalposts, talking about Kavanaugh’s drinking in school 30 years ago.

“Now Feinstein is moving to have the FBI report sealed and not made public.”

More details from the Conservative Tribune stating that CNN reporter Elizabeth Landers has tweeted:

“(Feinstein) indicates that the FBI report on Kavanaugh should NOT be made public: ‘It would seem to me that if people are going to be identified this ought to be held very close …”

“Funny, Feinstein didn’t seem all that concerned about keeping people’s identities ‘closely held’ when the letter sent to her from Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford was leaked to the media, nor did she exhibit any such concern when she publicly spoke about some of the other individuals named by Ford, or the other accusers who have popped out of the woodwork in Ford’s wake.”

YoungConservatives’ Arama echoes the puzzlement, quipping: “Wait, didn’t the Democrats demand that there be an FBI investigation and now they don’t want the public to know the results?”

Yep, knowing Feinstein and Co.’s track record, it should indeed be no surprise they seem determined to have it both ways — heads they win, tails Kavanaugh (and the GOP and America) lose:

“So in other words, if the FBI report isn’t good for them, sit on it. If there’s anything they can spin, let it out. Smear him in public, but clear him in private.” (Arama)

“Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), who supposedly played a role in getting Republican Sen. Jeff Flake to back off from his initial support of Kavanaugh, threw in these thoughts:

“‘I think that the work product of the FBI should be kept confidential to the Senate, but all senators should be able to review it,’ Coons told reporters.

“‘That’s typically what’s the case in any background investigation, the FBI delivers investigatory work — facts, not conclusions — and then senators review those files. But those are committee confidential files typically,’ he added.

“Also “typical” would be for the Senate Judiciary Committee to quietly investigate allegations against a nominee by itself, without dumping all of the disgusting details into public view via a coordinated media campaign.”

Don’t miss that last observation from CT’s Ben Marquis; it’s crucial: There has already been in place a process by which those original, scandalous, potentially ruinous – and now increasingly dubious — charges against Kavanaugh could have been vetted and brought before him discreetly by concerned senatorial parties. This would have occurred IN PRIVATE and WEEKS BEFORE the potentially defamatory information about the fifty-three-year-old jurist leaked. Moreover, it may have forestalled last week’s incriminating Senate Judiciary Committee circus which broadcast before millions of TV viewing Americans (and likely a hefty global audience, to boot. Lovely PR for the American system, by the way!)

“But,” wraps Arama, “because the Democrats leaked confidential information into the media and blew this whole thing up into a drama with the explicit purpose of stopping Kavanaugh, they don’t get to dictate now how he should be cleared.”

Indeed, as Boston radio talker Howie Carr might say, a “standing headline” could well be: Democrats’ Double Dealing Raises Its Head Again! Or: Lefts’ Hypocritical Standards Keep Changing the Terms of the Discussion! Or: ‘Party of Transparency’ Wants to Keep Info Hidden from American People.

Don’t forget, just short weeks ago the news cycle was dominated by Democrats’ complaints that not every grocery list and doodle Kavanaugh had ever generated — “100,000 pages of documents” — wasn’t made available to the committee.

Early in the prospective Justice’s hearings, Fox News quoted Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT), “We don’t know what is being hidden.”

Then, these mordant musings from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer: “President Trump’s decision to step in at the last moment and hide [100,000] pages of Judge Kavanaugh’s records from the American public is not only unprecedented in the history of [Supreme Court nominees], it has all the makings of a cover-up.”

Today’s Dems? Shhhh — keep the FBI findings shuttered away from the regular folks.

No denying, those Dem “goal posts” keep moving around like a Las Vegas chorus line on crack:

— Kavanaugh is a sleazy rapist – a gang rapist, in fact! Oops, well, never mind …

— But he WAS a high-school and college-age drunk, who’ll threaten the security of the Republic because he once allegedly threw ice on a fellow imbiber. Oh, not buying that, either?

— Okay, would you believe he was a belligerent maker of fart jokes when he was seventeen, eighteen?

— Hey, we need to bruit all this stuff around for those who might take it seriously – until it’s better to keep the details in the shadows, away from the delicate eyes of John and Jane Q Public. (They might decide wrongly, after all. Leave the deciding up to us, thank you very much.)

How do these characters reconcile themselves to their whipsawing lack of intellectual and moral integrity? How do they sleep at night? (Maybe they’re suffering exhaustion from all that never-ceasing, ruthless scheming, and scrambling.)

Meanwhile, American patriots DO need to reconcile themselves to something else: Leftist bad faith and duplicity ain’t going away anytime soon. It’s not that good people should grow to tolerate it, but they must be prepped to expose and meet it when it surfaces.

Or when the Democrats try to keep it from surfacing.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

Clinton IT aide created Gmail address to forward Hillary’s emails: report




* By

Continue Reading

New York Times Editor: We’re Switching From Russia Collusion To ‘Trump Is Racist’



The New York Times and others have repeatedly tried to take down President Trump with libelous statements on the Russian collusion front and have failed spectacularly every single time. Now, New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet has accidentally admitted that for two years his far-left newspaper was “built” around spreading a hoax. Oops. But it’s never too late to shift propaganda in this political war.

He was secretly recorded saying just that and it got out. Baquet also admitted the Times’ staff is loaded with left-wingers “who cheer us when we take on Donald Trump, but they jeer at us when we take on Joe Biden.” Do tell. I’m shocked I tell you. Simply shocked.

What is actually shocking is this recording comes by way of the leftist rag, Slate. They got their mitts on the recording of a company-wide meeting Baquet held with his staffers and it is an illuminating look at how leftist media utilizes and manipulates propaganda for political effect. Why Slate would let that out is puzzling, to say the least.

Baquet has now admitted that for two long years his leftist newspaper was “built” around the Russia Collusion Hoax: “It got trickier after [inaudible] … went from being a story about whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia and obstruction of justice to being a more head-on story about the president’s character. We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well.”

Truly well? Do you mean by lying and falsifying facts? They did that very well. There was not a shred of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia yet the NYT reported on it as fact for two years and in actuality, made stuff up to fit that narrative.

But the New York Times has seen the light, so to speak. The Russia collusion hoax hasn’t worked so now they are switching tactics… Trump is now a racist and everything will revolve around that lie: “Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story. I’d love your help with that. As Audra Burch said when I talked to her this weekend, this one is a story about what it means to be an American in 2019. It is a story that requires deep investigation into people who peddle hatred[.]”

The truth is that if Trump were actually a racist it would have come out decades ago. This is a last-ditch effort to besmirch a sitting president so a communist can take his place in the next election. It’s subversion and in my book… a form of treason.

You can still taste the salty leftist tears from being disappointed that Mueller did not take down Trump: “The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened. Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.” And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?”

So, while the NYT, WaPo, and other lefty rags spewed lies and propaganda, outlets such as Breitbart, The Daily Wire, and The Daily Caller among others did real reporting and told the truth. For their efforts, a number of them have been banned on social media.

From Breitbart:

“Baquet pretty much spends the rest of the 90 minutes meeting fielding questions from individuals who are supposed to be professionals but who only want to know how they can call Trump and his supporters racists even more often.

“You see, according to the Times’ staff, everything is racist because everything really is racist.

“You probably think that whole “everything is racist” thing is me being sarcastic. Here’s a direct quote from a staffer [emphasis added]:

Hello, I have another question about racism. I’m wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting. Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know? Like these conversations about what is racist, what isn’t racist. I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting. And so, to me, it’s less about the individual instances of racism, and sort of how we’re thinking about racism and white supremacy as the foundation of all of the systems in the country.

“Good grief. What a dispiriting and not-at-all surprising look at the ignorant whack jobs in charge of our media — and in the case of the New York Times, not just the media, but what is considered the elite of the media elite. What are they obsessed with? What do these conspiracy-loons see everywhere in 2019 America…?


“Here we sit in the most tolerant, diverse country in the world just a few years after having twice elected a black president with the middle name “Hussein,” and the people in charge of the media are breaking down into pools of self-pity because they want to scream racist at us even more than they already have.

“And again, let’s not forget that the only way they can try to pretend America is racist is by way of massive hoaxes: the Very Fine People Hoax, the Covington Hoax, the George Zimmerman Is White Hoax, the Hands Up Don’t Shoot Hoax, the Jussie Smollett Hoax, and the countless hoax hate crimes they spread over and over and over again without scrutiny.”

Good grief is an understatement. The NYT does not cover real news anymore like the rising tide of anti-Semitism in this country. They are too busy protecting terrorists and radicals, while smearing the president and conservatives, to do their actual jobs.

The New York Times openly admits that anti-Jewish hate crimes don’t interest the Times because white supremacists are not behind them: “If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy. During the past 22 months, not one person caught or identified as the aggressor in an anti-Semitic hate crime has been associated with a far right-wing group, Mark Molinari, commanding officer of the police department’s Hate Crimes Task Force, told me.”

But young white males are domestic terrorists according to these people. Geez. Not communist Antifa or Black Lives Matter or the Nation of Islam or the Black Panthers… white boys are the ticket, y’all.

Since the media is out of Russian ammo and they detest Trump, they have to have another way of smearing him and throwing the race card is their final desperate move in this political dance. Nothing else has stuck to Teflon-Don. Look for them to cry ‘racism’ non-stop for the next two years in their latest contrived hoax against the president. But you won’t hear them cover actual racism because it does not fit their political narrative. It has to be Trump, Trump, Trump! or it’s not news.

The NYT is a peddler of hate. No wonder they had to stop publishing political cartoons because the editorial staff can’t recognize blatant anti-Semitism. These aren’t journalists anymore… they are Brown Shirts. They feel they’ll get away with calling Trump a racist. After all, they got away with the Russian crap for two years.


Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend