Connect with us

Stacey Abrams: RNC Is Going To Send Off-Duty Police To Scare ‘Voters Of Color’



Former candidate for governor of Georgia Stacey Abrams is working hard these days and lying and smearing both the RNC and police officers. She seems to have a special hatred of police officers – that’s so very leftist of her… Black Lives Matter anyone? She is now openly accusing the Republican National Committee of planning to send off-duty police officers into minority polling centers to “scare voters, particularly voters of color.” That’s despicable behavior even from the likes of Abrams.

She made the outrageous statements on an appearance on ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’, where she claimed that the RNC just changed the rules in order to sway the 2020 election results. Mixed in with accusations that point towards Russia controlling our elections is a heavy dose of racism and cop-hatred.

“We know that we also face foreign influence that is being denied by the White House, by the would-be tinpot dictator of Donald Trump, but also that Moscow Mitch is stopping voter rights legislation and election security legislation,” Abrams said on the MSNBC program. “But we also know they just lifted a consent decree that’s kept Republicans and the RNC from going into local communities and intimidating voters by having off-duty officers tell people that they are monitoring their votes.”

Just asking… but does anyone remember the Black Panthers in the last presidential election standing outside of voting areas to intimidate voters? That was true harassment. I guarantee you off-duty police officers are not going to scare voters of color in the next election. That’s bull crap… but racist communists will be out doing exactly that.

The Democrats have officially gone insane and they are hoping and praying that Americans buy into it.

Abrams continued:

“For the first time since 1981, the RNC will be allowed to cheat and lie and go into polling places and scare voters, particularly voters of color,” Abrams claimed. “Fair Fight 2020 is designed to anticipate all those challenges, but not just worry about them, work against them, and that’s what we learned from 2018. We cannot wait for the cavalry to come. We have to be the army, and we have to stand up now.”

“We have to be the army,” she said in an apparent attempt to mobilize people who share her mindset. Furthermore, the Georgia Democrat says that if asked, she would agree to run for Vice President of the United States in 2020… by any Democratic candidate. No one seems to want her – go figure.

From Law Enforcement Today:

“Abrams lost the 2018 Georgia election to become governor, and has since been saying that she was defeated only due to a crooked election system over voter regulations inside the state.

“‘Abrams, who lost to Republican Brian Kemp last year by almost 55,000 votes in Georgia’s gubernatorial election, has repeatedly claimed her loss was the result of voter suppression tactics,’ the Free Beacon reported

“I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia,” Abrams said. “I don’t know that empirically I would have won, but if you add together the thousands of people who faced extraordinarily long lines, who faced hurdles that should not happen in a democracy, the votes that we know were not counted, the secretary of state, who was also my opponent in the race, purged more than 1.4 million voters over basically an eight-year period.”

“The RNC fired back against Abrams’ accusations.

“What she’s saying is totally baseless and irresponsible,” said RNC Communications Director Michael Ahrens. “The RNC’s job is getting more people to vote, not less. If Abrams actually cared about the integrity of elections, she’d finally concede the governor’s race she lost by 55,000 votes. Even liberal election law experts have dismissed her claims as irresponsible and without merit.”

“PolitiFact reported that Richard Hasen, an election law expert at University of California, Irvine, has said Democrats should cool it with rhetoric that the Georgia race was “stolen.”

“I have seen no good evidence that the suppressive effects of strict voting and registration laws affected the outcome of the governor’s races in Georgia and Florida,” he told PolitiFact. “It would be one thing to claim, as some have, that these laws are aimed to suppress the vote and likely suppressed some votes. It is quite another to claim that there is good proof they affected the outcome.”

“Abrams’ newest initiative for the 2020 election is called ‘Fair Fight 2020’, which aims to cut down on so-called “widespread irregularities that characterized the Georgia gubernatorial race, including inaccurate voter rolls, shortages of voting machines and provisional ballots, and lack of uniform rules for counting absentee ballots.”

“Abrams says her opponents are “hard at work dismantling democracy,” and that her new push will help ensure that no fraud will occur during the next election.

“We have a few questions for Abrams. Who told you that this would happen? Where have you found ‘off-duty officers’ that are willing to risk their careers and reputation to try and intimidate voters? How can you turn around and blame police for your failed campaign?

“Until the election, this is just another example of police being thrown under the bus in society’s eye.”

Abrams initiative will cost millions by the way and suppress votes, not liberate them. Her new initiative, announced Tuesday in a speech in Las Vegas at the 32nd General Convention for the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, targets 20 battleground states.

“We’re going to have a fair fight in 2020 because my mission is to make sure that no one has to go through in 2020 what we went through in 2018 because despite how hard they work, I am still here, and we are going to work to make sure every voice is heard,” Abrams said in the speech.

This next election is a fight for the heart and soul of America. Leftists such as Abrams are already telegraphing they will play dirty and they are maligning the RNC, President Trump, conservatives, and the police every which way they can. I say it’s time to dance.



Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

Steve Bannon’s Back And His New Show Is On FIRE! DEMS FREAK OUT!




* By

Stephen K. Bannon, Jason Miller, and Raheem Kassam are joined by guest Rep. Matt Gaetz on their daily show which you can watch live or past shows. It airs daily from 9am-10am EST every single day!

at 23:14 Congressman Gaetz comes live on the show and drops bombs on democrats.

The hosts discuss if “all roads lead to [John] Bolton”, as well as the new White House “informal” war room, the Jim Jordan letter about Saturday depositions, the Graham-McConnell resolution condemning the Democrat’s secretive impeachment inquiry.

Was the resolution watered down, and why?

Matt Gaetz sheds more light on his “storming of the SCIF”, as well as how the MAGA movement needs the “killer class” of 2016 Trump campaign operatives back on the front lines.

Continue Reading

VIDEO: Rashida Tlaib: Dems Discussing Arresting Trump Officials




* By

It’s crystal clear..that the left should never ever be allowed into our government. These are dangerous folks.

Maybe Rashida should be arrested for her connections to Islamic terrorists. The fact that this woman is in our government…is despicable!

Via The Daily Wire:

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) stated on Tuesday that House Democrats were discussing behind closed doors how to arrest the members of President Donald Trump’s administration who did not comply with congressional subpoenas.

“Let me tell you, this is pretty — and this is the last caucus conversation we had. Do you know this is really unprecedented? This is the worst time we’ve ever had a situation like this,” Tlaib said during a town hall meeting. “So they’re trying to figure out — no joke — they’re trying to figure out, ‘Well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them?’ No, no.”

“What are we hoping? I mean, I’m not in those kinds of conversations, but I’m asking, like, you know, what happens? And they’re like, ‘Well, Rashida, we’re trying to figure it out ourselves because this is uncharted territory,’” she continued. “No, I’m telling you that they’re trying to be like, ‘Well, where are we going to put them? Where are we going to hold them?’ No, I mean those are the kinds of things they’re trying to tread carefully.”

Accordingly, in an escalating effort to force White House officials comply with congressional subpoenas, House Democrats have reportedly been reexamining holding those members of the administration in inherent contempt — a power that the legislature has not used since 1935.

The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) explains that inherent contempt is the oldest of three strategies that Congress can use to enforce subpoenas. According to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank:

“Since 1935, Congress has relied on the executive and judicial branches when people refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. This practice makes sense: if Congress cannot get the information it needs on its own authority, then it can rely on the authority of the other branches of government. However, there is another option. Instead of turning to another branch, Congress can legally imprison or fine individuals who refuse to comply.”

Tlaib incorrectly suggested that the process could be enforced by the Washington, D.C. Police Department — the procedure actually only involves the chamber that is concerned. Following a contempt citation, the individual is arrested by the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms, and subsequently brought to the floor for punishment, which may include imprisonment.


Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend