I hope you are sitting down because it appears that Senator Chuck Schumer (NY-D) has once again demonstrated his hypocrisy, demonstrating by actions and words that he will and continues to take positions, not out of any sort of principled conviction, but because he believes they will grant him political gain.
Schumer has been an outspoken and vocal critic of President Donald Trump, as he has hammered the president on alleged ties to Russia and the “election hacking” scandal. Never one to suffer fools, President Trump also routinely calls Schumer out publically via Twitter as he is prone to do.
In March 2017, President Trump called for “an immediate investigation” into Schumer due to HIS ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling him a “hypocrite” due to a picture of Putin and Schumer surfaced from 2003 published in the Associated Press.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 3, 2017
Schumer is currently responding to the recent political stunt pulled by Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, with regard to the 12 indicted Russian intelligence operatives. Schumer demands that President Trump demand that President Putin “hand over” the 12 Russians in question.
.@realdonaldtrump, today my colleagues and I are officially calling on you to demand President Putin hand over the 12 indicted Russian intelligence operatives that interfered in the 2016 election. https://t.co/r8suBCKMxu
— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) July 14, 2018
Yet there are significant questions regarding the indictment as investigative journalist Paul Sperry notes, “Another strange Russia indictment by Mueller: no arrests, no American co-conspirators,no seizure of servers or property, no raids & no sourcing–no informants or witnesses named,nothing attributed to intercepts. In fact,none of the findings is attributed–not even to an FBI agent”
Another strange Russia indictment by Mueller: no arrests, no American co-conspirators,no seizure of servers or property, no raids & no sourcing–no informants or witnesses named,nothing attributed to intercepts. In fact,none of the findings is attributed–not even to an FBI agent
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 14, 2018
He continued – “Did Mueller leave out the sourcing for his evidence in Russia “hacking” indictment because its merely CrowdStrike, the Democrat cybersecurity shop? Did CrowdStrike supplement the forensics in the absence of the DNC server FBI and Mueller never seized so Quantico could examine it?”
Did Mueller leave out the sourcing for his evidence in Russia "hacking" indictment because its merely CrowdStrike, the Democrat cybersecurity shop? Did CrowdStrike supplement the forensics in the absence of the DNC server FBI and Mueller never seized so Quantico could examine it?
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 14, 2018
Schumer has also launched a campaign to block the nomination of President Trump’s most recent Supreme Court appointment Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanagh has been chosen to take the place of retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy. Schumer tweeted his opposition just after the announcement of Kavanaugh’s appointment had been made, stating – “I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are simply too high for anything less.”
I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are simply too high for anything less.
Read my full statement on #WhatsAtStake: https://t.co/BYtcB3LWWB #StopKavanaugh pic.twitter.com/5f2Bomxltb
— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) July 10, 2018
Yet during the prior administration, Schumer spoke out against what he termed as “obstructionist behavior” of Republican senators’ plans to filibuster former President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick to replaced deceased Justice Antonin Scalia.
Speaking to ABC’s This Week, Schumer stated virtually the opposite of what he is stating regarding the confirmation of Kavanaugh. Schumer stated – “Well, the job, first and foremost, is for the president to nominate and for the Senate to hold hearings and go through the process. You know, the Constitution, Ted Cruz holds the Constitution, you know, when he walks through the halls of Congress. Let him show me the clause that says president’s only president for three years…Here, he doesn’t even know who the president’s going to propose and he said, no, we’re not having hearings; we’re not going to go forward to lead the Supreme Court vacant at 300 days in a divided time…This kind of obstructionism isn’t going to last. And you know, we Democrats didn’t do this. When in the — we nominated — we voted 97-0 for Justice Kennedy in the last year of Reagan’s term.”
For the record, Schumer’s last statement is highly misleading in that the only reason Kennedy was nominated in the last year of Reagan’s term was that Senate Democrats blocked and voted down his first two choices the year prior.
Schumer also took a similar stance to his current stance on Kavanaugh nine years ago. At that time, he went out of his way to make sure the George W. Bush administration knew of his plans to filibuster any Supreme Court nominee they put forth of the next two years because the ideologies of the prior nominees did not align with his own.
In a speech given on July 27, 2007, Schumer stated – “We should not confirm any Bush nominee to the Supreme Court except in extraordinary circumstances. They must prove by actions, not words that they are in the mainstream rather than we have to prove that they are not.”
Senator Chuck Schumer calls flight attendant who told him to turn off cell phone ‘bitch’ https://t.co/n5tg6rdbJ0 Where is the outrage? Calling a women doing her job a Bitch! Where is all the Feminist outrage? You all drag stuff up from 20 years ago, this was only 9
— Eddie (@JN31621) July 13, 2018
Apparently, Schumer objected to a 300-day delay in appointing a Justice, was perfectly fine filibustering a Supreme Court nominee for 543 days?
Yet, not only is Schumer a hypocrite, he also believes the rules simply do not apply to him. Schumer was flying with his political protégé, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on a US Airways flight from LaGuardia Airport to Washington.
Both Schumer and Gillibrand were talking on their cellphones while the plane was boarding and continued to do even after the plane’s captain made the announcement for passengers to turn them off. The two Senators simply ignored the announcement and continued to talk on their phones. This prompted a flight attendant to politely ask the two Senators to simply follow the Federal Aviation Administration rules and simply turn their phones off as all the other passengers on the plane had already done.
According to a House Republican aide who was also on the flight and seated nearby, Schumer demanded to finish his call. The flight attendant told him “No” because the entire plane was waiting on him to shut his phone off in accordance with FAA regulations so they could take off. He was holding up the entire flight.
Schumer then ended the call, but promptly began to rage at the flight attendant proclaiming he was entitled to continue his phone conversation until the cabin door was closed.
Priceless! @VicciTrue US Airways flight attendant told Chuck Schumer she doesn’t make the rules, she just followed them..
— Paul Baldovin (@PaulBaldovin) February 2, 2017
The aide then responded to Schumer’s ridiculous antics, stating – “She said she doesn’t make the rules, she just followed them.” As she walked away, Schumer was heard muttering, “Bitch!”
Rather than being embarrassed for Schumer’s sanctimonious and pretentious outburst, Gillibrand attempted to cover for Schumer. She initially claimed the senior senator was “polite” and that “he turned off his phone when asked to.”
Once the story of the true version of events was made public, circulating the news – Gillibrand’s office made a second statement with a correction.
Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Schumer, said later that “[t]he senator made an off-the-cuff comment under his breath that he shouldn’t have made, and he regrets it.”
Gillibrand’s aide, Glen Caplin, said – “Chuck did the right thing by apologizing.”
The flight attendant accepted his apology but also stated Schumer has a reputation that precedes him – “He is NOT nice!”
After the incident Schumer was very critical and extremely vocal, condemning Republicans for “trying to score cheap political points” from the incident. Yet as evidenced by Schumer’s own words and actions that this seems to be HIS issue, not that of a flight attendant, or Supreme Court Justice nominee, the Russians, or President Trump.
Schumer is too busy playing political games and pandering to this or that special interest group, as well as adding commas and zeros to his own personal bank accounts than he is in effectively serving the people that elected him to Washinton. Schumer, your hypocrisy is showing again, you might want to tuck that back in!
Trending Now on Right Wing News
Kate Hudson: I’m Raising My Daughter ‘Genderless,’ Doesn’t Know What She’s Going To Identify As
It seems child abuse is running rampant in America today.
Actress Kate Hudson revealed last week that she’s raising her daughter with a “genderless” approach, since she’s unsure what gender she’ll “identify” as in the future.
She was asked if raising a baby girl will change her parenting approach from how she’s raising her two boys, Hudson told AOL.com, “It doesn’t really change my approach, but there’s definitely a difference. I think you just raise your kids individually regardless – like a genderless approach.
“We still don’t know what she’s going to identify as. I will say that, right now, she is incredibly feminine in her energy, her sounds and her way,” she continued. It’s very different from the boys, and it’s really fun to actually want to buy kids’ clothes.”
Hudson announced the arrival of her daughter in October. “She’s here,” Hudson posted on Instagram.
“We have decided to name our daughter Rani (pronounced Ronnie) after her grandfather, Ron Fujikawa,” explained the Fabletics founder. “Ron was the most special man who we all miss dearly. To name her after him is an honor.”
“Everyone is doing well and happy as can be,” she added. “Our family thanks you for all the love and blessings that have been sent our way and we send ours right back.”
Read more about this outrageous story via The Daily Wire
She ain’t the only insane celebrity doing this..many more like her unfortunately. Amazing how this child abuse is accepted. Quite disturbing.
Back in December 2017, singer Pink raved to ET Online about taking a “gender neutral” approach to parenting her daughter Willow and son Jameson; Willow was 11 at the time of the interview and Jameson was 11 months old.
“I was in a school and the bathroom outside the kindergarten said, ‘Gender Neutral – anybody,’ and it was a drawing of many different shapes,” the 38-year-old singer recalls. “I took a picture of it and I wrote, ‘Progress.’ I thought that was awesome. I love that kids are having this conversation.”
Pink continues on, telling the outlet she and Willow have already had plenty of their own conversations on gender neutrality. In fact, Pink says she sees herself as a pre-teen boy.
“I do bake sales and lemonade stands. I take my kid to school and try to get there on time,” she says. “I’m a fucking grown up now, it’s so weird. I’m still a 12-year-old boy.”
But a “12-year-old boy” who has serious chats with Willow, who’s already thinking ahead to her future.
“Last week, Willow told me she is going to marry an African woman,” Pink explains. “I was like, ‘Great, can you teach me how to make African food?’ And she’s like, ‘Sure, Mama. And we are going to live with you while our house is getting ready.'”
“I was like, ‘What the fuck, who are you?'” she adds. “‘Who is paying for this by the way?'”
There’s been plenty of laughs in the Hart household, Pink says, including conversations about President Donald Trump. She says Willow has given the commander in chief a hilarious nickname: “Donald Duck Trumpet.
“I don’t correct her. And I should, because it’s disrespectful, but it’s like — fuck it,'” she shares. “I feel like we are all in this permanent state of fuck it. I can’t imagine being a third-grader and this being the first example of what it means to be president.”
Translation: I’m abusing my child and setting her up to be an insecure failure in life. Which these children are going to end up having years of therapy due to this child abuse. What has this world come to that people are accepting this insanity and sickness?
Leftists having children is a scary thing.
Kathy Griffin Shares Photo Of Covington Students Flashing ‘New Nazi Sign,’ Quickly Deletes It
Kathy Griffin really has no concept of when to shut up and go away. Earlier this week she called for the doxxing of the Covington students. She has also posted a photo from one of the school’s basketball games that she claimed shows the boys “throwing up the new nazi sign.” She’s deleted it now, probably because attorneys made it known they were collecting evidence online for lawsuits. No doubt Griffin will be named in all that and should be.
“Covington’s finest throwing up the new nazi sign,” read the tweet. It included a picture of Covington Catholic High School basketball players holding up what anybody who’s ever watched a game would recognize as a “three-point” symbol. Anyone but Griffin it would seem. It’s too bad for Griffin that the Internet is forever.
Three pointers are racist!!! (screenshot) pic.twitter.com/nRs773vLFk
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) January 22, 2019
The pic has been making the rounds on the Internet. Griffin is being eviscerated on social media… again. She is real big on going after kids. She did it to President’s Trump’s son Barron and to his grandchildren. Griffin has also done it to other children as well – Sarah Palin’s kids come to mind. She is not well in my estimation.
When Griffin called for the doxxing of the boys, she said: “I want NAMES. Shame them. If you think these f***ers wouldn’t dox you in a heartbeat, think again.” Unable to contain herself from spouting lies and viciousness, she just keeps going. This time, I would wager, will really cost her in the form of lawsuits. She even double-downed on her calls for doxxing the boys, “Names please. And stories from people who can identify them and vouch for their identity. Thank you.”
— Esoteric Jeff (@EsotericCD) January 22, 2019
And right on cue, Robert Barnes, the attorney representing the boys pro bono and their families, is now saying they will indeed take legal action. “Hey, @kathygriffin, if someone wants to serve you a libel & invasion of privacy suit for these kids, do they send it to @LisaBloom or is she still busy helping Harvey?” Barnes tweeted.
Barnes is all over the media calling the allegations against the boys false and they are. “No media member who refuses to retract at this juncture has any credible defense to libeling these kids.” He has repeatedly called out specific media personalities and outlets threatening lawsuits if they fail to adequately retract their initial libelous reports. Earlier today, he said they had 48 hours to retract and apologize or be swept up in legalese.
Names please. And stories from people who can identify them and vouch for their identity. Thank you.
— Kathy Griffin (@kathygriffin) January 20, 2019
Griffin and her 18-year-younger boyfriend Randy Bick are also embroiled in another lawsuit per Hank Berrien at The Daily Wire. From The Wrap:
“According to the suit, Griffin and Bick “undertook a campaign of secret electronic surveillance and recording almost immediately after taking up residence,” first with their iPhones, then with an audio-video surveillance system that was pointed directly into the Mezgers’ backyard “in order to spy on and record them.” The suit says that Griffin and Bick “illegally captured hundreds of hours of audio and video from the Mezgers’ back yard” and that the Mezgers only learned about it in September 2017, months after the secret recordings began, when Griffin and Bick leaked one of the recordings to the media.”
Ah, the price of notoriety… eh, Kathy? Hope you have a really good lawyer on retainer. You are going to need one.
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) January 20, 2019
Many independent journalists who lean left agree the kids were falsely attacked, led by one of the best grassroots journalists in the country on these kind of issues, @Timcast. No media member who refuses to retract at this juncture has any credible defense to libeling these kids
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) January 22, 2019