Connect with us

Million-Dollar Democrat Bribe To Sabotage Trump’s Supreme Court Pick Just Revealed – Guess Who’s Paying!

Published

on

I don’t watch politics in Maine much because the Republican there is Senator Susan Collins, who I consider to be a squishy moderate at best. However, she’s our squishy moderate and the left is now attacking her. Even the most ‘meh’ states out there are now political battlegrounds it would seem.

Leftists set up a crowdfunding campaign that has raised over $1 million as of last week for the opponent of Collins if she doesn’t do as she’s told. They are trying to bribe Collins into not voting for the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Collins called it outright bribery and/or extortion and she’s right.

Liberal activist groups have posted the campaign on the platform Crowdpac, garnering both supporters and critics. “Senator Collins votes NO on Kavanaugh and you will not be charged, and no money will go to fund her future opponent,” the platform wrote. “Senator Collins votes YES on Kavanaugh and your pledge will go to her opponent’s campaign, once that opponent has been identified.”

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, speaks with Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh at her office, before a private meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Aug. 21, 2018. (Associated Press)

Here’s a hot tip for the left here. You just ensured that you cannot bribe Senator Collins and she will make this move an election talking point that is really going to hurt you. If you play rough out in public, expect to get smacked for it.

Collins’ spokeswoman told the Washington Post it was extortion. “And anybody who thinks these tactics would work on Senator Collins obviously doesn’t know her,” spokeswoman Annie Clark said in a statement. “Senator Collins will make up her mind based on the merits of the nomination. Threats or other attempts to bully her will not play a factor in her decision making whatsoever.”

What a dumb move by the left. Chances are they just solidified Collins’ seat and ceded her the moral high ground here. I wonder who the brain trust was that came up with this lame idea?

An ethics expert was quick to point out to the Washington Post that “it may very well violate federal bribery statutes.” Jeepers… I would certainly say so.

Of course, for every ethics expert out there that gives a sane and correct evaluation of the situation, you will find a leftist-loving, ethics-challenged one that says the opposite. Jordan Libowitz, who is a spokesman for the Citizens for Ethics and Responsibilities, told the Washington Post it doesn’t rise to the level of bribery, “because there’s no agreement.”

“It’s just the way money and politics tend to work these days,” he said. Uh, no it’s not. As far as an agreement, there does not have to be one to constitute extortion.

A supporter who endorsed the campaign, Julie B., stated: “women will stand together to protect our rights and what is right.” So, let me get this straight… you will break the law to do what you consider is right? If you are breaking the law doesn’t that argue that you don’t know or don’t care what is right? Just sayin’.

“The people of Maine are asking you to be a hero, Senator Collins,” the campaign wrote. “… to stand up for the people of Maine and for Americans across the country, every dollar donated to this campaign will go to your eventual Democratic opponent in 2020. We will get you out of office.” Again, no they are not. Communists, leftists, and activists are and they aren’t asking… they are bullying.

These are the same people who sent Collins’ Washington office a “three-foot-long cardboard cutout of male genitalia.” Gross and disgusting. The obscenity, of course, was accompanied by profanity.

Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch’s office weighed in on the cutout via Twitter: “The left’s campaign to pressure Senator Collins has gone from threats of sexual violence against young staffers to actual sexual harassment,” the tweet said. “This is abhorrent behavior and (again) deserves to be roundly condemned from the right and left.”

Actually, Senator, there should be arrests over this unseemly behavior. Seriously. Stalking, threats, and harassment like this should be illegal even in the state of Maine. Someone should look into the legal statutes over this and act accordingly.

Collins said one of the many voicemails stands out. “When I have a caller who tells a young staffer in my office who does casework that he hopes she is raped and impregnated, we have really reached a new low,” she said. That’s one way of putting it.

More threats were made:

“One incensed voter left a voicemail for Collins, which her office shared with USA TODAY, in which he repeatedly screamed insults while wondering how Collins could accept Kavanaugh’s statement that he considers Roe v. Wade to be “settled law” when he was “handpicked by the Federalist Society specifically to overturn” that decision.

“You will go down in history as the most naive person ever to be in Congress you (expletive), (expletive), feckless, naive woman!” the caller yelled.

“If you care at all about women’s choice, vote no Kavanaugh. Don’t be a dumb b—h,” another male caller said.

“A letter sent to Collins’ office warned that if she votes to confirm Kavanaugh “EVERY waitress who serves you is going to spit in your food, and that’s if you’re lucky you (expletive).'”

Collins insists that she has not decided how she will vote and had more questions for Kavanaugh in the wake of his confirmation hearing. But if I were her, I would now definitely vote for Kavanaugh after all this. First off, he’s way more than qualified, but secondly… the left hates him which is good enough for me. Twice.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Elizabeth Warren Says Use Taxpayer Money To Pay Student Debt – $1.25 TRILLION Cost

Published

on

If Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is a real economist, I’ll eat my hat. The woman is nothing more than an economically illiterate Marxist. She’s now proposing using taxpayer money to “cancel” hundreds of billions of dollars in student-loan debt and offer debt-free college for millions more, which would cost $1.25 trillion over the next decade.

I’m sure young people will mostly support this move, but ask yourself… where does the money come from to pay off these loans? If you said a wealth tax you get a cookie. She intends to rob the rich to pay off student loans. Economically speaking, that is moronic.

It is successful and rich business owners who provide jobs for everyone else. Your degree won’t mean much if you can’t find work. Margaret Thatcher once said that “The trouble with Socialism is that eventually, you run out of other people’s money.” She was more right than she ever knew.

Warren wrote a blog post on the leftist Medium site where she stated that the “huge student loan debt burden” is “crushing millions of families and acting as an anchor on our economy. It’s reducing homeownership rates. It’s leading fewer people to start businesses. It’s forcing students to drop out of school before getting a degree. It’s a problem for all of us.”

From The Daily Wire, here is some of Warren’s drivel:

“The first step in addressing this crisis is to deal head-on with the outstanding debt that is weighing down millions of families and should never have been required in the first place. That’s why I’m calling for something truly transformational — the cancellation of up to $50,000 in student loan debt for 42 million Americans.

“My plan for broad student debt cancellation will:

“Cancel debt for more than 95% of the nearly 45 million Americans with student loan debt;

“Wipeout student loan debt entirely for more than 75% of the Americans with that debt;

“Substantially increase wealth for Black and Latinx families and reduce both the Black-White and Latinx-White wealth gaps; and

“Provide an enormous middle-class stimulus that will boost economic growth, increase home purchases, and fuel a new wave of small business formation.”

This is money for nothing, chicks for free blather. It would destroy the middle-class and she knows it. You can’t afford to buy a home if all your income is going out in taxes to pay for other people’s education. I worked hard and paid off my loans and I don’t want to pay for others who want a free ride.

“Do I get a refund for having chosen a cheaper public university so I wouldn’t be riddled with a ton of debt?” wrote Josh Jordan. “Seriously this is stupid – everyone knows what they’re borrowing when they go through the process and I want no part in paying off everyone else’s student loans.”

“You better retro that and pay back all of us who diligently paid our loans back in full if you pull this bull—-,” wrote a Twitter user.

“Experts estimate my debt cancellation plan creates a one-time cost to the government of $640 billion. The Universal Free College program brings the total cost of the program to roughly $1.25 trillion over ten years,” Warren wrote. She would print money to cover the cost starting an economic domino effect that will leave us in a Weimer-esque Republic. The sheer idiocy of this proposal stuns me.

Warren says “the actual costs of these new ideas are likely to be even less than that,” and claims “we can fully cover the cost of these ideas with revenue from my Ultra-Millionaire Tax on the wealthiest 75,000 families in the country — those with fortunes of $50 million or more.” She is insane. Stripping the wealth from Americans like that is a suicide march off a Marxist cliff.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the plan would entail “an annual 2% levy on wealth above $50 million and an additional 1% tax on wealth above $1 billion.” You do know that most of the wealthy would find a way around that theft, right? In the end, it would be the middle-class paying for all this and the burden would crush us.

Under her plan, borrowers with a household income under $100,000 would have $50,000 of their student debt canceled. Borrowers with an income between $150,000 and $250,000 would be eligible for some debt cancellation, though not the full $50,000, and borrowers earning $250,000 or more wouldn’t have any of their debt canceled.

Warren, who is running for president in 2020 and stands no chance of being elected, also proposes using $50 billion in taxpayer funds for historically black colleges and universities, known as HBCUs. She wants to “prohibit public colleges from considering citizenship status” when making admissions decisions. So throw the borders open and educate the world while stealing from Peter to pay Paul. Galt’s Gulch is looking better and better if the leftists come back into power.

In addition, Warren wants to phase out federal money that now goes to for-profit schools. “After an appropriate transition period, ban for-profit colleges from receiving any federal dollars (including military benefits and federal student loans), so they can no longer use taxpayer dollars to enrich themselves while targeting lower-income students, servicemembers, and students of color and leaving them saddled with debt,” she wrote. Instead, she will saddle all of America with debt and ‘news flash!’… we’re already beyond broke. This would also begin to bring all colleges under the purvue of the federal government. Not good.

Student loan debt has more than doubled over the last 10 years to $1.5 trillion, and some economic experts say that it is driving the declining homeownership rates among young adults. Get a job, pay off your debt and stop whining. If you can’t pay it off, don’t take the loans. Go into business for yourself. Start acting more like an entrepreneurial American and less like a European Marxist weenie.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Adam Schiff Pressed On Steele Dossier – Doesn’t Want To Talk About It

Published

on

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (what a misnomer that title is) flatly refused to commit Sunday to investigate whether the Steele dossier is the product of Russian disinformation, a theory that has gained traction in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report. This is an intelligence tactic that Russia is an expert at. Oddly, Schiff doesn’t even want to talk about it.

I have said from the very beginning that the Steele Dossier was planted propaganda by the Russians and was passed on by leftist useful idiots here in the US. It would seem the head useful idiot doesn’t want to confront that he was played by the Russkies. Fox’s Chris Wallace got stonewalled by Schiff in an interview over the dossier. This is a remarkable shift for Schiff, who endorsed Steele’s unverified allegations about Trump associates during a public House Intelligence Committee hearing just over two years ago. Usually, you can’t shut the guy up.

During Schiff’s opening remarks at an Intelligence Committee hearing on March 20th, 2017, he cited dossier author Christopher Steele by name no less than six times. Wallace took pains to point out that the Mueller report established that much of the Steele dossier was either false or impossible to verify. He also asked Schiff point-blank whether it was appropriate to investigate whether the dossier was the product of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Our intelligence agencies are allegedly pondering whether Russian operatives planted disinformation with Steele, a former MI6 officer who has worked in Moscow, The New York Times reported Friday. No, they aren’t… they know damn well the Russians did exactly that. It’s nothing new for them. They have been doing this sort of thing to us for decades. Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA chief of station in Moscow, also recently told The Daily Caller News Foundation that he believes the dossier is the product of a Russian disinformation campaign. And he’s right… give the man a cookie.

From The Daily Caller:

“Don’t you think the question of exactly how this investigation began, was it a Russian disinformation campaign to try to get, since they were trying to set Americans against each other, not only to tarnish Hillary Clinton but also to tarnish Donald Trump, isn’t that a legitimate source of an investigation?” Wallace asked Schiff.

“The lawmaker dodged the question.

“Chris, you know, the reality is that the Republicans on our committee spent two years investigating exactly that because, frankly, they weren’t that interested in what Russia had done, the systemic attack on our democracy. They spent the focus of their two years investigating the investigators and investigating exactly that question,” Schiff said.

“Wallace jumped in to point out that the Mueller report has raised new questions about the dossier, which was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign.

“We do have new information, the Mueller report discredits a lot of that, says there was no indication that Carter Page did anything wrong. Shouldn’t you be looking at that just to find the truth?” asked Wallace.

“Schiff again refused to commit to investigating Steele’s report, which the FBI used to obtain surveillance warrants against Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser.

“Well, what we are going to be looking at is we’re going to be looking at all the counterintelligence findings that were the genesis of this investigation,” the California representative said. “Let me be very clear about this, the Mueller report makes it absolutely crystal clear that the initiation of this investigation was not only warranted but absolutely necessary because it revealed a widespread, systemic effort by the Russians to help the Trump campaign.”’

In the Mueller report, it was stated that Russian operatives disseminated emails stolen from the DNC and Clinton campaign. They came into possession of those emails because the Dems were dumb enough to fall for phishing schemes that let the Russians get at them. Mueller did not find any evidence of Trump conspiring with the Russians to steal those emails. And as I’ve said since the last election, the Russians didn’t really care who won. They had contingency plans no matter who won the presidency. It’s what they do.

Schiff and the other Democrats don’t want anyone looking too closely at the Steele Dossier and tracing its origins and veracity. They know where that will lead… Moscow. Senator John McCain was involved up to his eyeballs in this but he has passed on. Those who were involved should answer some very hard questions over all this and the money trail has already been found to lead back to the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, and their comrades.

And why is no one looking into Skolkolvo? Russia’s Silicon Valley that Hillary Clinton helped put in place. That also just happens to be where the majority of cyber attacks against the US come from.

I find it very interesting that Schiff is suddenly tight-lipped over the dossier. Perhaps he fears legal repercussions are coming. I sure hope they are. Could it be he’s embarrassed to be a useful idiot for communists? I don’t know why since he himself is a communist. Perhaps he is actually protecting his fellow comrades in a turn-the-tables moment. Вы товарищ?

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading
[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend