As the Democrats wage an all-out smear campaign against Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, the cowardice of the left is revealed in all its glory. When quite literally the best women can do as they have gained political power in America in the last 100 years is to simply ensure that their own offspring can continue to be murdered in the womb with impunity, no questions asked, one might want to take the time to do some serious soul-searching, as it appears the left has become the very monster they accuse others of being.
Perhaps Kavanaugh is a gang-raping, murdering, lying, sexual deviant that managed to reach the upper echelons of the legal community living a very public life. Perhaps that acclaim and honor he achieved was misplaced and that devotion to his wife and two daughters just a front. Perhaps all those women that spoke up regarding his character stating he never treated them with anything but respect are simply lying and his wisdom from the bench was merely a part of an elaborate plot to get away with it all. I suppose just about anything is possible.
But what if it isn’t?
What if it is merely a bunch of sick, sleazy, and baseless allegations grounded nowhere but in the sick twisted imaginations of the left? The idea that in a country that purports to uphold the idea of due process so highly it is literally mentioned in the Constitution twice in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, as the only principle to do so, that a man can be convicted and destroyed with no facts, no evidence, and the flimsiest of accusations based on uncorroborated memories from 35 years ago in what for all appearances is little more than a political witchhunt is a travesty of the highest order.
This is not justice, not by any definition. Kavanaugh is simply all that stands between the Democratic Party and the power it seeks to take over America, reforming it into a socialist hellhole much like Europe.
An allegation of sexual assault is a serious one of some significance. It deserves to be taken seriously by both those that investigate such allegations, as well as those who accuse others. If what Christine Blasey Ford says is true, then Kavanaugh’s behavior was inexcusable in the extreme. In her vague recounting of the events that occurred some 35 years ago (she thinks), he forced her into a room, turned the music up to hide her screams, put his hand over her mouth, tried to remove her clothes as she struggled to get away, and treated her so roughly she thought he might accidentally kill her. This would be a crime that would merit jail time, and it should.
But the question begs to be asked if these accusations are legitimate, then why did Blasey Ford choose to go to a politician with her accusations instead of any member of the law enforcement or legal community? Not only this but the four witnesses named by Ford as being present for the infamous event deny even knowing Kavanaugh, much less ever attending a party where he was present. Ford has named Kavanaugh himself who denies being there. His friend Mark Judge was also named and Ford claims he was even in the same room, yet he denies being at the party as well. Also named is their mutual friend Patrick Smyth, who denies he was there, and her friend Leland Ingham Keyser, who also denies being present and states she has never even met Kavanaugh
Frankly, it looks a lot more like the left believes that Kavanaugh is all that stands between the Democratic Party and the power it seeks. He is in the way. He must be crushed. Should his wife and two little girls be crushed along with him? Well, it is an acceptable casualty for the greater good.
That is simply not acceptable. It is despicable on a host of levels and it seems that author and PJ Media columnist John Hawkins concurs. Rather than sit idly by, Hawkins chose to launch a GoFundMe fundraiser to support Kavanaugh and his family as they endure this ruthless smear campaign being waged against them from the left.
I am doing a GoFundMe for Brett Kavanaugh and his family. If you're disgusted by the way he has been treated, please donate and spread this on Facebook and Twitter.https://t.co/rzzhkrba5u
— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) September 25, 2018
The Kavanaugh family is being publically derided and slandered with the flimsiest of accusations, and Market Watch reports that “Brett Kavanaugh may become the ‘poorest’ Supreme Court justice.” Meanwhile, Blasey Ford is lauded and treated as a heroine.
To quote Hawkins himself:
“Ford has some powerful incentives to lie that most victims of sexual assault do not have. She’s a diehard partisan who contributed to Bernie Sanders through ActBlue and signed a letter protesting Trump’s border policies. For someone like that, being able to stop Trump from appointing a Supreme Court justice, perhaps permanently if Democrats take over the Senate, would be an incredible accomplishment.
“She’s been publicly lauded by celebrities like Julianne Moore, Eva Longoria, Marisa Tomei, and Amy Schumer. On top of all that, two GoFundMe campaigns have raised almost $350,000 for Ford. There are more than a few people who would happily kill someone for $350,000, so we can be sure that there are plenty of people that would lie about a sexual assault for that kind of money. All of that gives Ford an extremely powerful motive to lie which cannot be overlooked.”
Hawkins goal is to raise $100,000 for the Kavanaugh family and to date, the Go Fund Me campaign has raised just over $27,000.
Trending Now on Right Wing News
Sorry. No data so far.
Judge Orders Hillary Be Deposed For Judicial Watch-Benghazi Lawsuit
We are lucky to have Judicial Watch. This is the only organization that is fighting for justice. This woman shouldn’t be walking free for the crimes she’s committed. No American citizen would be able to get away with these crimes. The left truly believe they are above the law.
It would be nice to see a Clinton in Prison.
A federal judge on Monday ordered former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to deliver a sworn deposition in response to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch over her role in the Obama administration’s response to the 2012 terror attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya.
U.S. District Court Royce Lamberth wrote in court filings that Clinton’s written answers to questions regarding the matter in a separate case were “incomplete” and “unhelpful” and demanded more information.
“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” wrote Lamberth. “Simply put, her responses left many more questions than answers.”
BREAKING: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records. Rules prior testimony "left many more questions than answers." https://t.co/pvW4CD2oBS
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) March 2, 2020
The judge added: “Even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained.”
Judicial Watch initiated the lawsuit in 2014 to uncover whether Clinton used her private email server to communicate about the Benghazi attack to skirt the Freedom of Information Act and whether the State Department reviewed records following an FOIA request from Judicial Watch. On September 11th, Ansar al-Sharia terrorists attacked the diplomatic compound, killing U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.
FLASHBACK August 2019 Court Grants NEW Discovery on Clinton Emails!
Via Judicial Watch:
We have won a significant victory in our pursuit of the truth about Hillary Clinton’s misuse of official email and the Deep State’s efforts to cover it up.
A federal judge granted us seven additional depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unauthorized email server.
Hillary Clinton and her former top aide and current lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to oppose being deposed by Judicial Watch (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)).
The court rejected Justice and State Department arguments to protect Mrs. Clinton and the agencies from additional discovery and ordered agency lawyers to respond to our questions about their knowledge of the Clinton email issue. The court granted all of our requested discovery but gave Clinton and Mills 30 days to file any opposition to the requests to question them in person under oath.
The new court-ordered discovery allows us to take testimony and gather evidence of Clinton’s handling of emails, specifically in an “after action memo” drafted by Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s senior advisor at State and White House liaison. The memo was created in December 2014 to memorialize the Clinton team’s processing of the Clinton emails. The discovery also asks when Justice and State Department attorneys learned about Clinton’s private email use; and what senior records-keeping officials at the State Department knew about Clinton’s emails and when they knew it.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:
VA Dems Introduce Bill To Take Pensions From Sheriffs Who Opposed Gun Control
Maybe it’s time we start taking pensions from all elected officials. Officials who are supposed to serve us. Not us serving them. These elected officials become millionaires in office. These people continue to take from the American people.
Democrat leadership is useless and dangerous. None of them should ever be allowed to have power. This is what they do with that power. The Founders warned us this would happen.
Dear American people..stop voting these people into office.
During CPAC, Culpepper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins told Breitbart News that Virginia Democrats are punishing sheriffs who continue to stand against gun control.
On December 7, 2019, Breitbart News reported Jenkins’ announcement that he was ready to “deputize thousands” to defend Second Amendment rights had the Virginia Democrats passed gun bans and other controls that were being pushed.
He made clear he equated his actions with calling forth the militia to defend freedom. He quoted Richard Henry Lee from 1788, saying, “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms.”
Over the past weekend of CPAC, Jenkins told Breitbart News:
In early December I came out against the newly proposed legislation to restrict everything from ‘assault weapons,’ so-called ‘assault weapons,’ to ‘high capacity magazines…and said that if we’re going to take away weapons from law-abiding citizens I intend to swear in thousands of citizens as reserve deputy sheriffs so they can keep those weapons and be able to protect themselves and use them.
Jenkins said that he and other sheriffs who took a similar stand were threatened with having insurance coverage removed “from deputies and staff.” He said that sheriffs throughout the state were offered a $10,000 raise “if we would tuck tail and follow [the Democrats’] lead and stop the push-back.”
But Jenkins refused to cower, and said they responded by saying “they would take away the raises of the deputies if we didn’t stop.”
He said State Sen. Janet Howell (D) “introduced a bill for next session where she could remove the pension of sheriffs…next year for…saying that we won’t follow unconstitutional laws or that I would use my lawful powers as sheriff to swear in thousands of people as deputies.”
Virginia Sheriff Vows to ‘Deputize Thousands’ to Defend Gun Rights
Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins says he will “deputize thousands” to defend gun rights should incoming Democrats use their legislative positions to enact more gun control in Virginia.
On December 4, 2019, Jenkins used a Facebook post to thank the Culpeper County Board of Supervisors for standing with the dozens of other counties that have declared their intention to defend the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
But his joy was mixed with somber warnings:
Every Sheriff and Commonwealth Attorney in Virginia will see the consequences if our General Assembly passes further unnecessary gun restrictions. “Red Flag” laws without due process will create enormous conflict as well.
America has more guns than citizens and murder has long been illegal. At best, the proposed gun restrictions will disarm or handicap our law-abiding in their defense and possibly cause a criminal to choose another tool for evil.
I remain very optimistic that our General Assembly will not pass the proposed bills. Obviously, if passed, there are many of us willing to challenge these laws through the courts. In addition, if necessary, I plan to properly screen and deputize thousands of our law-abiding citizens to protect their constitutional right to own firearms.”
In January, Sheriff Richard Vaughan vowed to defend the 2nd Amendment, also.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW: