Oh yes, she did. Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who came forward and accused former President Bill Clinton of raping her just face-planted Democrats.
She is calling their current ignorance over the Kavanaugh case, “The biggest double standard I’ve ever seen.” Broaddrick is saying that in relation to how the tables have been turned concerning the way they treat sexual misconduct allegations when it comes from one of their own against one of those they hate.
She fearlessly spoke to media outlets outside the Senate building where the Kavanaugh hearing was being held with the accuser. Kavanaugh himself is not due to testify until after the accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, who is claiming that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in 1982.
If you did not know already, Ford is claiming she had first revealed the alleged assault during a therapy session she had back in 2012 and since has told multiple people. Broaddrick told the media that there was “no comparison” between her and case and Ford’s.
She disclosed exactly why she felt this way:
“Because Dr. Ford has no evidence, I had the who, what, when, where and how and had five people that I told, not even counting the woman who found me 30 minutes after the rape with a swollen busted lip, torn clothes and in a state of shock,” she said.
Broaddrick’s claims that Bill Clinton raped her back in 1978 while she was living in Arkansas and working at a nursing home as an administrator. Bill Clinton at the time was the state attorney general. Her story claims she was attacked and left by Clinton with a bloody lip and one direction which was to “put some ice on that.”
Clinton did what Clintons do. He denied the accusation. All of it.
“On Thursday, she attacked Democrats, such as Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who she said did not believe her in the ’90s but have jumped to believe Ford’s account, despite the corroborating evidence Broaddrick said she had in her case.”
“How they can take these accusations and run with them, and laugh at mine for so many years is the biggest double standard I’ve ever seen,” she said.
“It makes me angry that they left [Clinton] in office,” she said about the Senate Democrats who she said refused to consider her allegations.”
“Broaddrick indicated she was skeptical about Ford’s accusations”
“It’s not that I’ve decided, she hasn’t anything truly evidentiary to this point, how can she all of a sudden have something new to say today? She’s presented nothing,” she said.”
From The Daily Wire:
“How they can take these accusations and run with them, and laugh at mine for so many years is the biggest double standard I’ve ever seen,” Broaddrick said. “It makes me angry that they left [Clinton] in office,” Broaddrick said about Senate Democrats who rejected to hear her allegations”
“I have twenty times more evidence for my rape by Bill Clinton than Dr. Ford has against Kavanaugh. Democrats turned their backs on me. They refused to read or acknowledge me in 1999 when I went public with my story. Democrats turned their backs on me.”
“Broaddrick told the Daily Caller in an interview that she showed up at the Senate to “look hypocrites Schumer, Durbin and Feinstein in the eye and ask for an apology.”
“Broaddrick calls the hearing today a “double standard.”
“I have twenty times more evidence for my rape by Bill Clinton than Dr. Ford has against Kavanaugh,” Broaddrick says, “Democrats turned their backs on me. They refused to read my testimony or acknowledge me in 1999 when I went public with my story. Democrats turned their backs on me.”
“Broaddrick said that the mantra the ‘All women deserve to be believed” does not apply to her.”
“All women are to be believed if they’re not conservatives and as long as the assault was not done by Democrats.”
Broaddrick brought up the domestic abuse allegations against DNC Co-Chair Keith Ellison: “Ellison is leading the Democratic party right now. He should be kicked out of office. Karen Monahan has 10 times the evidence that Dr. Ford does. Where is her hearing?”
I asked her if Dr. Ford is asking for what Broaddrick asked for years ago, and feels she didn’t get, the chance to be heard – to be believed…
She said (firmly) no. She said her situation was different because she “had evidence.” Broaddrick says Ford does not.
— Ellison Barber (@ellisonbarber) September 27, 2018
Broaddrick is firm in her mission to call out Democrats for jumping the second they heard Ford’s allegations. They didn’t hesitate to stop and question anything and chose instead to believe her on her word, without proof or evidence of any kind.
Broaddrick is calling them all out as “hypocrites” and has no plans in slowing down her effort to show the world that today’s Senate hearing was a “circus” and furthermore that Feinstein ‘owes’ her an apology. Stating that “she refused to read my hard evidence against Clinton in 1999. Do I deserve to be believed?”
According to Broaddrick’s retelling of the encounter:
“Arriving later in the lobby, he called and asked if they could have coffee in her room instead because there were too many reporters in the lobby, Broaddrick said. “Stupid me, I ordered coffee to the room,” she said. “I thought we were going to talk about the campaign.”
“As she tells the story, they spent only a few minutes chatting by the window — Clinton pointed to an old jail he wanted to renovate if he became governor — before he began kissing her. She resisted his advances, she said, but soon he pulled her back onto the bed and forcibly had sex with her. She said she did not scream because everything happened so quickly. Her upper lip was bruised and swollen after the encounter because, she said, he had grabbed onto it with his mouth.”
“The last thing he said to me was, ‘You better get some ice for that.’ And he put on his sunglasses and walked out the door,” she recalled.”
What do you think? Does Broaddrick have a right to feel the way she does about the Kavanaugh hearing?