Connect with us

HUGE Turn Of Events! Feinstein Just Made Shock Admission After Framing Kavanaugh



Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) continues to throw about wild accusations, now accusing Republicans of “blocking any investigation” by the FBI into the ludicrous, if not predictable, eleventh-hour accusations levied against Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearings.

Feinstein tweeted: “Republicans have learned nothing from Anita Hill. President Bush asked the FBI to do its job and investigate Hill’s allegations, which it did. Now, under the Trump administration, Republicans want to do even less by blocking any investigation into Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegations.”

Except that is one big, fat lie.

Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, with a hazy recollection of the incident, freely admits she does not specifically remember the year the supposed incident happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was in, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness – who denies Blasey Ford’s account in totality mind you – were already upstairs when she went up, or even just how she got home on the night in question.

Sounds like a story with holes in it large enough to drive a truck through… yet Feinstein passed a letter bearing this vague and less-than-credible account of an alleged sexual assault some 36 years prior to the FBI demanding an investigation.

A letter that is believed to have been in Feinstein’s possession for more than six weeks in which she failed to turn it over for an immediate investigation, choosing instead to wait until the last minute of a highly contentious confirmation hearing.

In spite of that, the Department of Justice chose to provide a detailed explanation as to exactly why the FBI would not be investigating it as a crime.

Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement:

“The FBI does not make any judgment about the credibility or significance of any allegation. The purpose of a background investigation is to determine whether the nominee could pose a risk to the national security of the United States. The allegation does not involve any potential federal crime. The FBI’s role in such matters is to provide information for the use of the decision makers.”

In other words, Feinstein was fully aware of FBI protocol and knew before she ever turned over the vague insinuations that the FBI is not going to be opening an investigation.

Yet, that clearly has not stopped Feinstein from demanding that Kavanaugh’s hearing be indefinitely delayed if the FBI chooses not to investigate the highly suspicious allegations.

What has become increasingly and abundantly clear is that there is clearly nothing that is beneath that of the progressive left, up to and including ruining a man with a sterling reputation who has clearly worked very hard to attain the levels of achievement that he has. 

Feinstein’s only interest is in playing politics and delaying the confirmation until after the 2018 midterm election with the hopes the Democrats will retake power in Congress and sufficiently block Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Meanwhile, lawmakers are hoping both Kavanaugh and Ford will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kavanaugh, who has agreed to testify, has strongly denied the “completely false allegation.” However, Blasey Ford claims through her attorney she is “not prepared to talk” with the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing on Monday.

Kavanaugh issued a statement of his own regarding his intentions to testify, stating: 

“I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone. Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday. I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

Interestingly enough, Blasey Ford’s account of the alleged events also contradicts her therapist’s notes from 2012 detailing how four men were in the room when she was allegedly assaulted, as opposed to Blasey Ford’s most recent version of events stating it was just Kavanaugh and another teenager, Mark Judge, in the room.

It seems the left intends to force a face-off of Kavanaugh and Blasey Ford in some sort of a believe-a-thon the likes of which have not been seen since Anita Hill’s accusations thrown at USSC Justice Clarence Thomas at the 11th hour of his confirmation – after the FBI leaked an interview given by Hill.

However, at the end of the day, the Democrats’ decision to sit on this for six weeks before peddling the accusation days before the confirmation vote may do more to harm Blasey-Ford’s credibility than her own murky memories of what happened.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News

Elizabeth Warren Says Use Taxpayer Money To Pay Student Debt – $1.25 TRILLION Cost



If Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is a real economist, I’ll eat my hat. The woman is nothing more than an economically illiterate Marxist. She’s now proposing using taxpayer money to “cancel” hundreds of billions of dollars in student-loan debt and offer debt-free college for millions more, which would cost $1.25 trillion over the next decade.

I’m sure young people will mostly support this move, but ask yourself… where does the money come from to pay off these loans? If you said a wealth tax you get a cookie. She intends to rob the rich to pay off student loans. Economically speaking, that is moronic.

It is successful and rich business owners who provide jobs for everyone else. Your degree won’t mean much if you can’t find work. Margaret Thatcher once said that “The trouble with Socialism is that eventually, you run out of other people’s money.” She was more right than she ever knew.

Warren wrote a blog post on the leftist Medium site where she stated that the “huge student loan debt burden” is “crushing millions of families and acting as an anchor on our economy. It’s reducing homeownership rates. It’s leading fewer people to start businesses. It’s forcing students to drop out of school before getting a degree. It’s a problem for all of us.”

From The Daily Wire, here is some of Warren’s drivel:

“The first step in addressing this crisis is to deal head-on with the outstanding debt that is weighing down millions of families and should never have been required in the first place. That’s why I’m calling for something truly transformational — the cancellation of up to $50,000 in student loan debt for 42 million Americans.

“My plan for broad student debt cancellation will:

“Cancel debt for more than 95% of the nearly 45 million Americans with student loan debt;

“Wipeout student loan debt entirely for more than 75% of the Americans with that debt;

“Substantially increase wealth for Black and Latinx families and reduce both the Black-White and Latinx-White wealth gaps; and

“Provide an enormous middle-class stimulus that will boost economic growth, increase home purchases, and fuel a new wave of small business formation.”

This is money for nothing, chicks for free blather. It would destroy the middle-class and she knows it. You can’t afford to buy a home if all your income is going out in taxes to pay for other people’s education. I worked hard and paid off my loans and I don’t want to pay for others who want a free ride.

“Do I get a refund for having chosen a cheaper public university so I wouldn’t be riddled with a ton of debt?” wrote Josh Jordan. “Seriously this is stupid – everyone knows what they’re borrowing when they go through the process and I want no part in paying off everyone else’s student loans.”

“You better retro that and pay back all of us who diligently paid our loans back in full if you pull this bull—-,” wrote a Twitter user.

“Experts estimate my debt cancellation plan creates a one-time cost to the government of $640 billion. The Universal Free College program brings the total cost of the program to roughly $1.25 trillion over ten years,” Warren wrote. She would print money to cover the cost starting an economic domino effect that will leave us in a Weimer-esque Republic. The sheer idiocy of this proposal stuns me.

Warren says “the actual costs of these new ideas are likely to be even less than that,” and claims “we can fully cover the cost of these ideas with revenue from my Ultra-Millionaire Tax on the wealthiest 75,000 families in the country — those with fortunes of $50 million or more.” She is insane. Stripping the wealth from Americans like that is a suicide march off a Marxist cliff.

The Wall Street Journal reported that the plan would entail “an annual 2% levy on wealth above $50 million and an additional 1% tax on wealth above $1 billion.” You do know that most of the wealthy would find a way around that theft, right? In the end, it would be the middle-class paying for all this and the burden would crush us.

Under her plan, borrowers with a household income under $100,000 would have $50,000 of their student debt canceled. Borrowers with an income between $150,000 and $250,000 would be eligible for some debt cancellation, though not the full $50,000, and borrowers earning $250,000 or more wouldn’t have any of their debt canceled.

Warren, who is running for president in 2020 and stands no chance of being elected, also proposes using $50 billion in taxpayer funds for historically black colleges and universities, known as HBCUs. She wants to “prohibit public colleges from considering citizenship status” when making admissions decisions. So throw the borders open and educate the world while stealing from Peter to pay Paul. Galt’s Gulch is looking better and better if the leftists come back into power.

In addition, Warren wants to phase out federal money that now goes to for-profit schools. “After an appropriate transition period, ban for-profit colleges from receiving any federal dollars (including military benefits and federal student loans), so they can no longer use taxpayer dollars to enrich themselves while targeting lower-income students, servicemembers, and students of color and leaving them saddled with debt,” she wrote. Instead, she will saddle all of America with debt and ‘news flash!’… we’re already beyond broke. This would also begin to bring all colleges under the purvue of the federal government. Not good.

Student loan debt has more than doubled over the last 10 years to $1.5 trillion, and some economic experts say that it is driving the declining homeownership rates among young adults. Get a job, pay off your debt and stop whining. If you can’t pay it off, don’t take the loans. Go into business for yourself. Start acting more like an entrepreneurial American and less like a European Marxist weenie.


Continue Reading

Adam Schiff Pressed On Steele Dossier – Doesn’t Want To Talk About It



House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (what a misnomer that title is) flatly refused to commit Sunday to investigate whether the Steele dossier is the product of Russian disinformation, a theory that has gained traction in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report. This is an intelligence tactic that Russia is an expert at. Oddly, Schiff doesn’t even want to talk about it.

I have said from the very beginning that the Steele Dossier was planted propaganda by the Russians and was passed on by leftist useful idiots here in the US. It would seem the head useful idiot doesn’t want to confront that he was played by the Russkies. Fox’s Chris Wallace got stonewalled by Schiff in an interview over the dossier. This is a remarkable shift for Schiff, who endorsed Steele’s unverified allegations about Trump associates during a public House Intelligence Committee hearing just over two years ago. Usually, you can’t shut the guy up.

During Schiff’s opening remarks at an Intelligence Committee hearing on March 20th, 2017, he cited dossier author Christopher Steele by name no less than six times. Wallace took pains to point out that the Mueller report established that much of the Steele dossier was either false or impossible to verify. He also asked Schiff point-blank whether it was appropriate to investigate whether the dossier was the product of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Our intelligence agencies are allegedly pondering whether Russian operatives planted disinformation with Steele, a former MI6 officer who has worked in Moscow, The New York Times reported Friday. No, they aren’t… they know damn well the Russians did exactly that. It’s nothing new for them. They have been doing this sort of thing to us for decades. Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA chief of station in Moscow, also recently told The Daily Caller News Foundation that he believes the dossier is the product of a Russian disinformation campaign. And he’s right… give the man a cookie.

From The Daily Caller:

“Don’t you think the question of exactly how this investigation began, was it a Russian disinformation campaign to try to get, since they were trying to set Americans against each other, not only to tarnish Hillary Clinton but also to tarnish Donald Trump, isn’t that a legitimate source of an investigation?” Wallace asked Schiff.

“The lawmaker dodged the question.

“Chris, you know, the reality is that the Republicans on our committee spent two years investigating exactly that because, frankly, they weren’t that interested in what Russia had done, the systemic attack on our democracy. They spent the focus of their two years investigating the investigators and investigating exactly that question,” Schiff said.

“Wallace jumped in to point out that the Mueller report has raised new questions about the dossier, which was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign.

“We do have new information, the Mueller report discredits a lot of that, says there was no indication that Carter Page did anything wrong. Shouldn’t you be looking at that just to find the truth?” asked Wallace.

“Schiff again refused to commit to investigating Steele’s report, which the FBI used to obtain surveillance warrants against Carter Page, a Trump campaign adviser.

“Well, what we are going to be looking at is we’re going to be looking at all the counterintelligence findings that were the genesis of this investigation,” the California representative said. “Let me be very clear about this, the Mueller report makes it absolutely crystal clear that the initiation of this investigation was not only warranted but absolutely necessary because it revealed a widespread, systemic effort by the Russians to help the Trump campaign.”’

In the Mueller report, it was stated that Russian operatives disseminated emails stolen from the DNC and Clinton campaign. They came into possession of those emails because the Dems were dumb enough to fall for phishing schemes that let the Russians get at them. Mueller did not find any evidence of Trump conspiring with the Russians to steal those emails. And as I’ve said since the last election, the Russians didn’t really care who won. They had contingency plans no matter who won the presidency. It’s what they do.

Schiff and the other Democrats don’t want anyone looking too closely at the Steele Dossier and tracing its origins and veracity. They know where that will lead… Moscow. Senator John McCain was involved up to his eyeballs in this but he has passed on. Those who were involved should answer some very hard questions over all this and the money trail has already been found to lead back to the Democrats, Hillary Clinton, and their comrades.

And why is no one looking into Skolkolvo? Russia’s Silicon Valley that Hillary Clinton helped put in place. That also just happens to be where the majority of cyber attacks against the US come from.

I find it very interesting that Schiff is suddenly tight-lipped over the dossier. Perhaps he fears legal repercussions are coming. I sure hope they are. Could it be he’s embarrassed to be a useful idiot for communists? I don’t know why since he himself is a communist. Perhaps he is actually protecting his fellow comrades in a turn-the-tables moment. Вы товарищ?


Continue Reading
[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend