Connect with us

Grassley Sends Blistering Letter To Ford’s Attorneys – He Has Some SERIOUS DIRT On Them

Published

on

Senator Chuck Grassley who is the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee has just turned “common sense” into a weapon of justice. He sent a letter to Christine Blasey Ford’s attorneys with a few requests. In the letter, he reiterated his request for materials he’s been asking for, for quite a while already. These materials are her therapy notes, her polygraph results and materials, and all communications with the Washington Post. However, in this newest request, it was the last paragraph of his letter that really revealed he could have some real dirt on them. He made a few “new” requests.

So how do you think Blasey’s attorneys responded? Well, of course, they claimed they were eager to cooperate with the Committee and all requests. However, what they are saying, and what they are doing, are two very different things. So far they have refused to turn over the requested information, and at the same time having the audacity to claim that the therapist’s notes and the polygraph results and materials are corroborative of Ford’s claims. Because we should all be taking their word as money right?

Nope. WRONG.

As if that isn’t curious enough, we also have learned that their last communication to Grassley was very much in opposition of their original claim to be eagerly helpful to all requests. They had the ‘you know what’ to tell Grassley that they would only turn over the information if he told the FBI to interview Ford. Obviously, that request got DENIED quickly by Grassley and gave him the opportunity to point out what should come as common sense to most. He is now telling them if the evidence they are refusing to supply really supported her claim, why aren’t they willing to provide it?

Get Your Justice Kavanaugh T-Shirt Now!!!

“Grassley then set the record straight about the attorneys using their objections to the FBI investigation as an excuse to deny the Judiciary Committee access to the information they were demanding. He wrote, “The FBI’s investigative decisions aren’t our concern. Even if the FBI never interviews Dr. Ford, or interviews her ten times, this Committee has a constitutional obligation to investigate Dr. Ford’s allegations, and that’s what we’ve been doing since we became aware of her allegations.”

“Grassley pointed out that the attorneys had “claimed repeatedly that the evidence I have requested supports Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. She even provided some of this evidence to national news. Indeed, if the evidence supported your client’s allegations, you surely would produce it as quickly as you could.”

“Then Grassley really got to the nitty-gritty: “But you have repeatedly refused to produce this evidence to the Senate. In doing so, you are preventing the Senate from considering the evidence most crucial to Dr. Ford’s allegations. I don’t know what other inference we should draw from your refusal but that the withheld evidence does not support Dr. Ford’s allegations in quite the way you have claimed.”

Amen Grassley! If this isn’t to the point enough for you, there is more that I guarantee will be.

Here’s the final paragraph in the letter. It’s very important.

“In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

Here, check out the whole letter:

Grassley knows there is something going on behind all the nonsense Ford’s attorneys are pulling on him. It also is very apparent that the people are recognizing that he might have some very serious dirt on Ford’s team according to his LAST paragraph.

https://twitter.com/dottydavis/status/1048201542778671109

“Now part of that may be the bombshell revelation that the Wall Street Journal dropped this morning – that alleged witness Leland Keyser allegedly told the FBI that Ford’s ‘allies’ were trying to pressure her to change her testimony to appear not as though it were refuting the allegation. The report specifically named Ford’s friend, FBI Agent Monica McClean. McClean’s attorney, David Laufman, denied the report, calling it false.”

“The other interesting parts are communications with Hirono and Feinstein, as well as with Ramirez and Swetnick. Do they have something showing coordination, that’s what it sounds like.”

I hope you take the time to read the letter, and if you do, pay very close attention to the LAST paragraph, that’s the golden ticket. Grassley has made it CLEAR that the gloves are off, and it’s time to play like big boys. Do you like what you’re seeing with Grassley’s communication with Ford’s attorneys?

Ford’s attorneys have really darkened the waters, do you think Grassley is going to be the guy to put them on clean-up duty?

Text of the full letter:

“I’m writing in response to your response to my letter dated October 2. You said that Dr. Ford is willing to turn her documents over to the FBI, but my request of you was not for documents to be turned over to the FBI. I asked you to provide the documents to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Your response on behalf of your client is a non-sequitur. The Constitution charges the Senate with advising the President on his nomination. Senators have a constitutional obligation to investigate and evaluate independently the President’s nominees. Our obligation is unrelated to anything the FBI does. That’s why we don’t just vote on nominees after the President loans us the FBI background investigation. We have to make our own assessment.

The U.S. Senate doesn’t control the FBI. If you have an objection to how the FBI conducts its investigations, take it up with Director Wray. But don’t raise that objection as a reason not to respond to this Committee’s demand for relevant evidence. The FBI’s investigative decisions aren’t our concern. Even if the FBI never interviews Dr. Ford, or interviews her ten times, this Committee has a constitutional obligation to investigate Dr. Ford’s allegations, and that’s what we’ve been doing since we became aware of her allegations.

It’s not even clear to me what purpose turning over these materials to the FBI would accomplish. The FBI would simply turn over that evidence to the Senate. That is precisely the outcome I seek with this request.

You have claimed repeatedly that the evidence I have requested supports Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. She even provided some of this evidence to national news. Indeed, if the evidence supported your client’s allegations, you surely would produce it as quickly as you could.

But you have repeatedly refused to produce this evidence to the Senate. In doing so, you are preventing the Senate from considering the evidence most crucial to Dr. Ford’s allegations. I don’t know what other inference we should draw from your refusal but that the withheld evidence does not support Dr. Ford’s allegations in quite the way you have claimed.

I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence. In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.”

We want to know what YOU think about all this, join the discussion in the comments!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Trump cracks down on catch-and-release loopholes

Published

on

...

* By

Continue Reading

AOC says the Electoral College is a ‘scam’ that hurts minorities

Published

on

...

* By

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend