Connect with us

GOP Rep From Texas Calls On Dems To Block Tlaib Taxpayer-Funded Trip To Palestine

Published

on

Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib has been on a tear since being sworn in. She proudly wears anti-Semitism as a badge of honor. Not only has her office literally taken Israel off the map, she openly poses with Hezbollah-backing anti-Israel activist Abbas Hamideh.

This guy is an anti-Israel extremist who heads a “right of return” advocacy group. He has equated Zionism to Nazism and called Israel a “terrorist entity.” He also attended a Detroit swearing-in reception and dinner party for freshman Rep. Rashida Tlaib, where he posed with her for a photograph that he tweeted last Saturday.

Tlaib’s actions are so extreme that some are now calling for actions to be taken against her.

Texas Republican Rep. Brian Babin is doing something about this. Good for him. He’s calling on every Democratic House Committee Chairman to reject any request to authorize a taxpayer-funded Congressional delegation to Palestine as put forth by Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib. That is more than appropriate considering her actions. We should not pay for a terrorist Israel-hating bashfest.

Michigan Democrat Rashida Tlaib poses with the pro-Hezbollah “right of return” activist Abbas Hamideh on Saturday, January 12, 2019. (Twitter)

Babin wrote a letter to these chairmen and made his intentions crystal clear:

“… as a newly elected Member of Congress, Rep. Rashida Tlaib has plans to lead a taxpayer-funded Congressional delegation (CODEL) to Palestine. This action, from an outspoken supporter of the ‘BDS’ Israeli boycott movement and whose personal vitriol led her to publicly brag about calling our President a ‘mother****er’ to her young son, is both ill-conceived and inconsistent with our national values.

“Israel is of vital importance to U.S. interests in the Middle East, a fact widely acknowledged on both sides of the aisle. Since Israel’s beginnings, our nations have pursued strong relations based on common values, providing mutual security in the region and helping to spread democratic practices. The mere prospect of a CODEL like this threatens that relationship. Allowed to proceed, this action could undo years of goodwill built by the foreign policy and Israeli-American communities. To signal to our most threatened ally in the region that the United States Congress sanctions an official trip to visit Israel’s nemesis would be an exceedingly dangerous path forward.”

Babin wants these chairmen to “deny Rep. Tlaib’s request to sponsor and lead a CODEL to Palestine and exercise your authority as chair to deny your consent to any member of your committee who seeks your approval to participate in such a misadventure. Please consider the damage that a yet inexperienced and overly caustic Member of Congress may cause to Israeli relations, or the perceptions of our own Jewish-American citizens.” I could not agree more.

Tlaib is the first Palestinian-American member of Congress. After she was elected, she immediately announced a trip to the West Bank. The trip would be in lieu of the Israeli sponsored AIPAC trip offered to incoming freshmen congressmen.

“I want us to see that segregation and how that has really harmed us being able to achieve real peace in that region,” Tlaib said. “I don’t think AIPAC provides a real, fair lens into this issue. It’s one-sided. … [They] have these lavish trips to Israel, but they don’t show the side that I know is real, which is what’s happening to my grandmother and what’s happening to my family there.” And they all hate Israel and call for the Jewish country to be wiped off the map. I detect a trend.

Tlaib received notoriety when she said to a group of supporters that Democrats will “impeach that Motherf**ker,” while referring to President Trump. So, it would seem she hates Israel, President Trump, and America in general. How the heck did this woman get elected?

Tlaib and fellow Muslim congresswoman Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) are vocal supporters of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which urges private entities and governments to avoid business with Israel’s government due to their treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. But as usual, this is deflection. The Israelis don’t mistreat the Palestinians, it’s the other way around. It’s another excuse for hatred and Tlaib is the perfect mouthpiece for it.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Obama & Hillary Won’t Say ‘Christians’ Were Slaughtered In Sri Lanka, Get RIPPED For It

Published

on

Both former President Barack Obama and twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton were universally ripped by Christians over refusing to use the term “Christian” when referencing the victims of the Sri Lankan slaughter. Instead, they called them “Easter worshippers.” Words matter and this was no slip – they were coordinated talking points.

And it wasn’t just those two hardened leftists… many of the Democratic leadership parroted the same term as did ABC and the Associated Press. It’s like they were gagging on the word “Christian.” But they had no reflux over using the term “Muslim” during the Christchurch attacks.

Suicide bombers targeted churches and hotels on Sunday in Sri Lanka as Christians started their Easter celebrations. The death toll stands at 310, reportedly including citizens from the United States, as well as 500 others who suffered injuries. The fact that Obama, Clinton, and their comrades could not say “Christian” after attacks clearly targeting them is deeply disturbing and telling.

“The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity,” Obama reacted. ”On a day devoted to love, redemption, and renewal, we pray for the victims and stand with the people of Sri Lanka.”

“On this holy weekend for many faiths, we must stand united against hatred and violence. I’m praying for everyone affected by today’s horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka,” Clinton wrote after news of the attacks broke.

Social media melted down over the slap at Christians. Muslim reformer and political commentator Imam Mohamad Tawhidi was quick to contrast Obama and Clinton’s reactions from the Sri Lanka attacks to that of the New Zealand mosque attacks. “Spot the difference,” wrote the Imam, posting screenshots of Obama and Clinton recognizing the “Muslim community” in the wake of the New Zealand attack. Good for him.

Daily Wire contributor Harry Khachatrian torched the left, “If only there was a single word for ‘Easter worshippers.'” Fox News’ Brit Hume similarly posted, “‘Easter worshippers’ aka Christians.” “Yeah we’re actually called Christians not ‘Easter worshippers’ wouldn’t hurt to maybe just say that,” said National Review writer Alexandra DeSanctis. The Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles nailed it: “The word you’re looking for is ‘Christians.'”

From The Daily Wire:

“Blaze TV’s Allie Beth Stuckey argued with those suggesting the semantics don’t matter. “I’m seeing a lot of people say the semantics aren’t that big of a deal. Strongly disagree,” she said. “When every single top Dem used the same phrase & downright refuse to use the word ‘Christian,’ despite Christians being the #1 target of religious harassment in the world, it’s intentional.”

“Journalist Ian Miles Cheong critiqued leaders on the Left thusly: “Neat how Christchurch prompted world leaders to condemn islamophobia worldwide but hundreds of Christians are killed in multiple church bombings on Easter in Sri Lanka and not a single one of these leaders condemns this particular trend,” he wrote, adding a shot at Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN): “‘Some people did something,’ as it were.”‘

Parker Molloy of Media Matters also called Christians ‘Easter worshippers’ and tried to shred anyone for taking offense to the term. Remember, both Obama and Clinton during Obama’s tenure drew criticism for their reluctance to identify radical Islam as the source of many terror attacks.

Remember this from Obama?: “In an address to the National Prayer Breakfast in 2015, Obama attempted to draw a moral equivalence between the terror and torture used by the so-called “Islamic State” (or ISIS), and medieval Christianity. He admonished Americans not to “get on our high horse” about radical Islam, since “people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ” centuries ago.”

When the Catholic cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris, France was burned to the ground, Obama offered his thoughts on “one of the world’s greatest treasures,” with no mention of the church’s meaning to Christians. “Notre Dame is one of the world’s great treasures, and we’re thinking of the people of France in your time of grief. It’s in our nature to mourn when we see history lost – but it’s also in our nature to rebuild for tomorrow, as strong as we can,” Obama tweeted.

“Pointing out how odd it is that the most influential Democrats are avoiding saying the word “Christian” isn’t a conspiracy,” Independent Journal Review’s Caleb Hull noted. “It’s a legitimate observation.” Indeed.

Say it with me… “Christian.” Democrats act like the Christian faith is literally holy water being tossed in their faces. They deserve to be called out on this and lambasted for it. Let’s not mince words… the left hates Christians and Jews. They just aren’t hiding it anymore.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Bernie Sanders Says ‘Let Terrorists, Sex Predators & Murderers Vote From Prison’

Published

on

Socialist Bernie Sanders made it abundantly clear during a CNN town hall event that he would let the Boston Marathon bomber, sex predators, and murderers vote in U.S. elections while in prison. At least he’s upfront about supporting evil in order to get votes. You can say many things about Sanders but he’s jarringly honest about what he believes. I consider him a very dangerous man who should never be allowed to be president and this confirms that belief.

“Would [you] support enfranchising people like the Boston Marathon bomber, a convicted terrorist and murderer?” Sanders was asked by Harvard student Anne Carlstein. “Do you think those convicted of sexual assault should have the opportunity to vote for politicians who could have a direct impact on women’s rights?”

“Thank you for the question, and let me just say this: What our campaign is about and what I believe is creating a vibrant democracy,” Sanders stated while whining about voter turnout in the U.S.

“If somebody commits a serious crime, sexual assault, murder, they’re going to be punished,” Sanders said. “They may be in jail 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, their whole life. That’s what happens when you commit a serious crime.”

“But I think the right to vote is inherent to our Democracy,” he continued. “Yes, even for terrible people, because once you start chipping away … you’re running down a slippery slope … I believe even if they are in jail, they’re paying the price to society, that should not take away their inherent American right to participate in our democracy.”

First off, this isn’t a democracy… it’s a republic and there’s a huge difference in that concept alone. Per Wall Builders:

“Many Americans today seem to be unable to define the difference between the two, but there is a difference, a big difference. That difference rests in the source of authority.

“[O]ur citizens should early understand that the genuine source of a pure Democracy operates by direct majority vote of the people.

“When an issue is to be decided, the entire population votes on it; the majority wins and rules. A Republic differs in that the general population elects representatives who then pass laws to govern the nation. A Democracy is the rule by majority feeling (what the Founders described as a “mobocracy”); a Republic is rule by law.”

Sanders knows this… socialists want a Democracy because it is easier to control the masses.

From The Daily Wire:

“CNN’s Chris Cuomo, who hosted Sanders’ town hall, asked Sanders if he was sure that he supported allowing the Boston Marathon bomber to be able to vote from inside prison.

“Sanders doubled down.

“Look, this is what I believe. Do you believe in Democracy?” Sanders continued. “Do you believe that every single American 18 years of age or older who is an American citizen has the right to vote. Once you start chipping away at that, believe me that’s what our Republican governors all over this country are doing.”

“I believe every single person does have the right to vote,” Sanders concluded.”

No, they don’t. Those who violate the rule of law in our Republic lose that right and for good reason. Justifying their right to vote so you can have them support you in the next election is disingenuous and despicable, to say the least. Sanders is supporting terrorists, sex offenders, and murderers here and it’s all self-serving.

Sanders argued that the Constitution says “everybody can vote” and that “some people in jail can vote.” That is not true. The Constitution says that all citizens over the age of 18 can vote but it does not delineate on who can or can’t vote. Sanders is trying to deceptively argue it does for his own purposes here.

The Boston Marathon Bomber should not be breathing air much less voting in American elections. And Sanders should never be president.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend