Connect with us

GAME OVER: Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford Drives Final Nail Into Her Coffin

Published

on

Well, Folks, it’s official. The Liberal Left will now become even more unhinged than normal.

The sex crime prosecutor who questioned Ford last week, Rachel Mitchell, laid out in a clear five-page memo for the Committee all the inconsistencies she actually found in Christine Blasey Ford’s story. Confirming that she would never bring charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh based upon the evidence and testimony’s given.

Mitchell stated that this was “even weaker” than a “he said/she said” case. Because according to her expertise the witnesses, named by Ford, actually refute or don’t corroborate her case whatsoever.

Here is more on this via Chicks On The Right:

“Here are the problems detailed by Mitchell.
1. Ford isn’t consistent on when the assault ever occurred.

She varies, with multiple descriptions, telling the WaPo the “mid-1980s,” Feinstein “early 80s,” the polygraph statement “high school summer in early 80’s” with early then crossed out, the WaPo “summer of 1982.” Notes from a therapy session she provided the WaPo said “late teens” but she told the WaPo and the Committee she was 15. And she’s refused to turn over the therapy notes. While one might be unclear about a date, “Dr. Ford failed to explain how she was suddenly able to narrow the timeframe to a particular season and particular year.”

2. She didn’t actually name Kavanaugh in the therapy notes in 2012 and 2013 and then the odd question where she says that “her husband recalls that she used the name.”

3. She testified that she told her husband that she had experienced a “sexual assault” before they were married. But she told the WaPo that she told him she had experienced “physical abuse” before they were married. She said she was referring to the same thing.

4. What she doesn’t remember are key details that could prove (or disprove) her claim.

She does not remember who invited her to the party or how she heard about it.

Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.
Her inability to remember this detail raises significant questions.
She told the Washington Post that the party took place near the Columbia Country Club. The Club is more than 7 miles from her childhood home as the crow flies, and she testified that it was a roughly 20-minute drive from her childhood home.
She also agreed for the first time in her testimony that she was driven somewhere that night, either to the party or from the party or both.
Dr. Ford was able to describe hiding in the bathroom, locking the door, and subsequently exiting the house. She also described wanting to make sure that she did not look like she had been attacked.
But she has no memory of who drove her or when. Nor has anyone come forward to identify him or herself as the driver.
Given that this all took place before cell phones, arranging a ride home would not have been easy. Indeed, she stated that she ran out of the house after coming downstairs and did not state that she made a phone call from the house before she did, or that she called anyone else thereafter.

But then she remembers small details that wouldn’t prove or disprove her case, such as that she had one beer and took no medications.

5. None of the people she alleged to be at the party have corroborated her claim or even that there was such a party.
Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, Patrick “PJ” Smyth, and her lifelong friend Leland Keyser (née Ingham). During the hearing she claimed there was another boy but she couldn’t recall the name.

Moreover, Dr. Ford testified that her friend Leland, apparently the only other girl at the party, did not follow up with Dr. Ford after the party to ask why she had suddenly disappeared.

6. Ford’s story about what happened has not been consistent.

In her letter to Feinstein, she said he heard Kavanaugh and Judge talking to other people at the party while she was hiding in the bathroom. But during testimony, she said she couldn’t hear them.

And she’s been inconsistent about describing who was at the party with multiple versions.

7. Ford had trouble recalling important recent actions relevant to making her claims.

She couldn’t recall if she showed her therapist’s notes to the WaPo (she did). And she refused to show the Committee the therapist’s notes.

She said she wanted it to remain confidential but she actually called the WaPo tipline before she told anyone else and despite saying that she had a “sense of urgency to relay the information to the Senate and the president” she contacted her representative, not Feinstein first.

She said she couldn’t remember if she was recorded while she was taking the polygraph.

And she could not remember whether the polygraph occurred the same day as her grandmother’s funeral or the day after her grandmother’s funeral.

Mitchell also makes the point that it’s professionally wrong to administer a polygraph to someone grieving.

8. There are questions about her alleged psychological effect of the ‘assault.’

While claiming a fear of flying, she flies frequently for work and hobbies, she flies to the Mid-Atlantic and has flown to Hawaii, French Polynesia, and Costa Rica as well as to Washington, D.C. for the hearing.

It’s not clear that her attornies ever told her about Chairman Grassley’s offer to have people fly to California to interview her.

She doesn’t say that she had problems in the rest of high school while she says this contributed to issues in college.

She implied there were other issues that contributed to her symptoms but when asked about them, she wouldn’t list other issues, noting none was a “striking as” this.

9. The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account:”

As you can see her story doesn’t add up. No matter how much the left kicks, screams and throws tantrums her story just cannot be collaborated.

There is no doubt something happened to this woman, real or imaginary. But the fact is she has contradicted herself too much and she lied way too much although the left wing media tried to convince us that she was truthful and credible. I don’t know of one person who’s opinion she changed.

The biggest red flag in my book was the fact that she had issues flying but we later found out she was a frequent flyer who flies often for both business and pleasure. When asked about this she said she has no issue flying when it’s for vacation? What?

We know this woman can’t be all there, after all, she is or claims to be a psychologist which is pretty much a field that changes parameters depending on what far left social justice platform they care to support this month. But you would expect if she was going to make an accusation like that she would at least try to seem credible.

And let’s not forget the fact that her social media pages were scrubbed the moment the letter came out. Odd, don’t you agree?

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


As Wealthy Flee New York, Cuomo Warns Budget Problems ‘Serious as a Heart Attack’

Published

on

The wealthy have been fleeing the socialist policies of New York for some time now. The flight of those who have money is speeding up however just as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is warning of budget problems. He announced Monday that state income tax revenues plummeted by $2.8 billion since he introduced his new budget plan last month which means spending will have to be massively cut in the state. He says he needs to reconsider spending on schools, healthcare, and repairs to roads and bridges.

Instead of taking stock of his failing fiscal policies, Cuomo, of course, blamed President Trump’s new tax plan for the state’s problems. In actuality, it is high taxes on everything that is choking the life out of New York and businesses there. Socialists are great at giving stuff away until they run out of other people’s money… that would be the wealthy fleeing the state.

From Newsday:

“Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Monday announced a dramatic drop in state income tax revenue of $2.8 billion, which he says will prompt him to revise his 2019-20 budget and reconsider spending on schools, health care and repairs to roads and bridges.

“Cuomo, a Democrat, blamed the shortfall on a federal tax plan backed by Republican President Donald Trump. Cuomo said the law’s cap on deductions for state and local taxes at $10,000 was to blame and suggested it is, anecdotally, triggering high-earners to leave New York.

“At this point there is no doubt that the budget we put forward is not supported by the revenues,” Cuomo said at a State Capitol news conference. “It’s as serious as a heart attack.”

“Cuomo said he’s not certain what areas might need to be cut, but said the biggest spending areas now are education, health care, infrastructure and another phase-in of a previously approved middle-class tax cut.

“I fear it’s going to get worse before it gets better,” state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in a rare news conference with Cuomo. “It’s not all gloom and doom, but it’s a matter of very, very serious concern.” Tax revenues could rebound, he said, but he agreed with Cuomo that early indicators are not good.

“Cuomo has until mid-February to submit amendments to his budget, which came in at $175.2 billion when he unveiled it Jan. 15.

“The announcement also serves notice to the legislature, which for the first time in most of a half-century is controlled by Democrats.

“The Democratic majorities in the Senate and Assembly have several proposals to add to the budget. Cuomo will no longer have Senate Republicans as an ally for fiscally conservative measures. The Republicans lost the majority in the November elections.”

New York’s revenue problems can’t be blamed on Trump. I don’t blame those who are successful for hightailing it out of New York. They get to keep a pittance of their hard-earned income. Between state, city, and federal taxation there’s not much left when these thieves are done. Note to Cuomo… those wealthy you are fleecing are the ones that actually work and pay taxes.

Cutting taxes and enticing business to the state is the way to go, but liberals can’t seem to wrap their heads around the concept. In fact, you have Marxists such as NY Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others in the Democratic Party who want to raise the top tax rate to a whopping 70% or more. They want to do away with billionaires too. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

It’s a good thing Cuomo will never be elected president. He would turn all of America into New York. As The Federalist put it, “Not since John F. Kennedy was President has there been a Democrat that understood lower taxes on the wealthy helps the poor.” And that certainly includes Cuomo.

Continue Reading

Amazon Cancels Plan For New York City Headquarters & 25k Jobs Because Of Ocasio

Published

on

This is not a good day for New York and the good citizens there can thank their liberal tax and spend elitist leaders for their misery. That includes Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. You could say that Jeff Bezos and Cuomo lose and Trump wins once again. That makes me smile.

Fresh off Cuomo making a pilgrimage to the White House to beg President Trump for money and then being told to frack off, another blow just landed to a state that suddenly has a deficit of $2.3 billion in their budget. This won’t help that. Amazon has canceled its plans to build its second headquarters in New York City.

After Ocasio-Cortez whined over the job-maker coming to New York, Bezos decided he had had enough of the socialists. At least for now. He seems rather bent that way himself. Bezos not only owns Amazon.com… he owns the fact-challenged Washington Post. He’s also in the middle of the world’s most expensive divorce.

“After much thought and deliberation, we’ve decided not to move forward with our plans to build a headquarters for Amazon in Long Island City, Queens,” the Seattle-based Amazon said in the release.

“For Amazon, the commitment to build a new headquarters requires positive, collaborative relationships with state and local elected officials who will be supportive over the long-term. While polls show that 70% of New Yorkers support our plans and investment, a number of state and local politicians have made it clear that they oppose our presence and will not work with us to build the type of relationships that are required to go forward with the project we and many others envisioned in Long Island City,” the statement reads.

What you don’t read there is it is also a tax and regulation issue. New York has been remade into a hostile business environment by leftists. This is the result of that. The company added that it is “disappointed to have reached this conclusion.” I’m sure they are… now they’ll be forced to set up shop in a less-progressive location. Bummer.

“We are deeply grateful to Governor Cuomo, Mayor de Blasio, and their staffs, who so enthusiastically and graciously invited us to build in New York City and supported us during the process,” the company continued in the statement. I wonder if some harsh words are being thrown at Ocasio-Cortez right now.

From Fox News:

“Bankrate.com’s senior economic analyst Mark Hamrick called it a “stunning development,” adding: “For those who didn’t want Amazon to bring the promised 25,000 new jobs and added economic vitality to the area: Be careful what you wish for.”

“Earlier this month, reports surfaced that Amazon was reconsidering its plans for its New York office, which led to cheers from Ocasio-Cortez. “Can everyday people come together and effectively organize against creeping overreach of one of the world’s biggest corporations? Yes, they can,” the freshman lawmaker tweeted.

“Ocasio-Cortez has also slammed the company for having bias in its facial recognition technology.

“Fox News has reached out to Governor Cuomo, Mayor de Blasio and Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez’s office for comment.

“Amazon said it would proceed as planned with the second part of its HQ2, which will be built in Northern Virginia, as well as its distribution center that it said it would open in Nashville. It will also continue to “hire and grow across our 17 corporate offices and tech hubs in the U.S. and Canada.”

“The deal was greeted with much fanfare when it was announced last year and was lauded as a major economic boost.

“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio had touted the benefits of Amazon’s HQ2, which included a pledge from the tech giant to create 25,000 jobs, paying an average of $150,000 per year in exchange for a slew of city and state tax breaks and subsidies worth up to $3 billion.

“In addition to the 25,000 jobs, Amazon would’ve brought $2.5 billion in Amazon investment and eventually 8 million square feet of office space to Long Island City as part of its investment announced last November. The Seattle-based company said it would have generated “incremental tax revenue of more than $10 billion over the next 20 years as a result of Amazon’s investment and job creation.”‘

A recent poll showed that 57 percent of New Yorkers welcomed Amazon and the jobs it would bring. So much for socialists supporting the working man.

And while there are those that dithered over what Amazon’s decision could do to already rising real estate prices in the area, Hamrick said this won’t solve those problems.

“From a broader view, this decision will do nothing to resolve the challenges associated with housing affordability voiced by critics of the Amazon decision and the generous tax incentives offered by government,” Hamrick said in comments obtained by Fox News. “That requires a bigger conversation which could very well unfold along with the 2020 election cycle.”

One thing is certain, less business means fewer jobs, which means less money rolling into New York’s coffers. This is what happens when you let socialists run your state like a bunch of free-range chickens.

Sources: Fox News, Red State

Continue Reading
[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend