Connect with us

Feinstein Gets Brutal Dose Of Karma – Female Victim Demands Investigation On HER She Covered Up

Published

on

Sexual assault has been a topic at the forefront of the media because of the controversy surrounding the Supreme Court Justice nomination process. Judge Kavanaugh was accused by four women of sexual assault, something that has stalled his nomination process. While Democrats have taken action to stall the process, accusers who are pointing blame at Democratic leadership are starting to come out of the woodwork.

Keep and Bear reported,

“Sharyn Bovat says she was sexually assaulted in 1990 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco where Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) was celebrating her birthday. Bovat says a Japanese investor/donor was the man who committed the crime after she made her way back to her hotel room. Bovat describes how her mother, a Democrat, was a friend of Feinstein’s, and that the Senator was complicit in covering up what happened.

Sharyn claims she was never going to go public with this information until she saw how Feinstein and Democrats did everything possible to assassinate the character of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. In this second video, Bovat highlights how she was turned away by Democrats:

Will Democrats care about this woman and her allegations as much as they did Christine Blasey Ford and the other women who maligned Kavanaugh? During his time to speak at the Kavanaugh/Ford hearing on Thursday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz brilliantly exposed Feinstein. From Right Scoop:

Ted Cruz, in his normal brilliant way, refuted the nonsense put forth by Feinstein during the Kavanaugh hearing that they didn’t do anything wrong in this process. What happened in the clip (between the cuts) that you don’t see is that during Cruz’s comments, Feinstein interjected that they didn’t leak the letter to the press. But even more than that, Feinstein defended herself by saying that she was told to keep the letter confidential by Ford and that’s what she did.

Feinstein sent Ford’s letter to the FBI after sitting on it for weeks and weeks. From Western Journal: Sen. Dianne Feinstein referred a letter relating to Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the FBI for investigation.

“I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further,” the California Democrat said in a statement released on Thursday. “I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities,” she continued.

Continued: The Hill reported that over the past two days Feinstein, who is the senior Democrat member on the Judiciary Committee, has declined to answer Capitol Hill reporters’ questions about the letter. She has also refused to share the contents of the letter — which was reportedly first given to her by Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif. — with fellow members of the Judiciary Committee, according to The Intercept.

Almost immediately, the secret letter blew up in Democrats’ faces as the FBI announced they were not investigating Kavanaugh. From Daily Wire: The Federal Bureau of Investigation has declined to investigate Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh over allegations sent to them by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).

Matt Zapotosky of The Washington Post quoted an FBI official as saying: “Upon receipt of the information on the night of September 12, we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh’s background file, as per the standard process.” He also reported that the agency was not opening a criminal investigation into what Kavanaugh may or may not have done as a high school student.”

Feinstein is insisting on further investigation into Kavanaugh and Ford despite having previously sat on credible evidence that President Clinton was being accused of raping a woman. Feinstein, Durbin, Murray, and Schumer, all sat on pertinent information when Juanita Broaddrick accused then-President Clinton of sexually assaulting her. A time when she was a teenager, in his hotel room, during his gubernatorial race in Arkansas.

This was when the Senate was in the middle of an impeachment trial for the president in 1999. Not one Democratic, including Feinstein, called for an investigation into Broddrick’s accusations. Despite the fact that Broaddrick had been interviewed by Ken Starr and questioned.

None of Broadrick’s friends including Susan Lewis, Jean-Darden, and Louise Ma were interviewed regarding the allegations. Despite the fact they had corroborated Broaddrick’s story to NBC News. A polygraph test was not asked for or required, or even done. All of which has been called upon to be completed in the current case of Judge Kavanaugh vs. Christine Blasey Ford.

Share if you believe this woman who is accusing Feinstein.

Share if you think this proves that Senator Feinstein is corrupt.

Share if you agree this indicates Democrats have a double standard about sexual assault.

Share if you do not want Senator Feinstein and her Democratic colleagues pulling any more students in the nomination process.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Steve Bannon’s Back And His New Show Is On FIRE! DEMS FREAK OUT!

Published

on

...

* By

Stephen K. Bannon, Jason Miller, and Raheem Kassam are joined by guest Rep. Matt Gaetz on their daily show which you can watch live or past shows. It airs daily from 9am-10am EST every single day! www.WarRoom.org

at 23:14 Congressman Gaetz comes live on the show and drops bombs on democrats.

The hosts discuss if “all roads lead to [John] Bolton”, as well as the new White House “informal” war room, the Jim Jordan letter about Saturday depositions, the Graham-McConnell resolution condemning the Democrat’s secretive impeachment inquiry.

Was the resolution watered down, and why?

Matt Gaetz sheds more light on his “storming of the SCIF”, as well as how the MAGA movement needs the “killer class” of 2016 Trump campaign operatives back on the front lines.

Continue Reading

VIDEO: Rashida Tlaib: Dems Discussing Arresting Trump Officials

Published

on

...

* By

It’s crystal clear..that the left should never ever be allowed into our government. These are dangerous folks.

Maybe Rashida should be arrested for her connections to Islamic terrorists. The fact that this woman is in our government…is despicable!

Via The Daily Wire:

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) stated on Tuesday that House Democrats were discussing behind closed doors how to arrest the members of President Donald Trump’s administration who did not comply with congressional subpoenas.

“Let me tell you, this is pretty — and this is the last caucus conversation we had. Do you know this is really unprecedented? This is the worst time we’ve ever had a situation like this,” Tlaib said during a town hall meeting. “So they’re trying to figure out — no joke — they’re trying to figure out, ‘Well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them?’ No, no.”

“What are we hoping? I mean, I’m not in those kinds of conversations, but I’m asking, like, you know, what happens? And they’re like, ‘Well, Rashida, we’re trying to figure it out ourselves because this is uncharted territory,’” she continued. “No, I’m telling you that they’re trying to be like, ‘Well, where are we going to put them? Where are we going to hold them?’ No, I mean those are the kinds of things they’re trying to tread carefully.”

Accordingly, in an escalating effort to force White House officials comply with congressional subpoenas, House Democrats have reportedly been reexamining holding those members of the administration in inherent contempt — a power that the legislature has not used since 1935.

The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) explains that inherent contempt is the oldest of three strategies that Congress can use to enforce subpoenas. According to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank:

“Since 1935, Congress has relied on the executive and judicial branches when people refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. This practice makes sense: if Congress cannot get the information it needs on its own authority, then it can rely on the authority of the other branches of government. However, there is another option. Instead of turning to another branch, Congress can legally imprison or fine individuals who refuse to comply.”

Tlaib incorrectly suggested that the process could be enforced by the Washington, D.C. Police Department — the procedure actually only involves the chamber that is concerned. Following a contempt citation, the individual is arrested by the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms, and subsequently brought to the floor for punishment, which may include imprisonment.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend