I detest Kamala Harris. There I said it. She is an arrogant, b*itch on wheels, and a sea hag to boot. Now, that I’ve got that off my chest, let’s see what she stumbled into this time. Harris went to Iowa and figured going to a retirement home would get her a juicy photo-op with a bunch of elderly voters. It didn’t quite work out that way.
One feisty retired woman got in Harris’ face over healthcare. She blasted Democrat presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (CA) over her healthcare plan (or lack thereof) on Monday during a campaign stop at the Bickford Senior Living Center in Muscatine, Iowa. Harris’ solution to healthcare is based on massive tax increases and socialized medicine.
“Can I ask you a question?” the woman asked Harris. “I understand that you are advocating healthcare for everyone.”
“Yes, ma’am,” Harris responded.
“Who’s going to pay for it?” the woman asked.
“Well, we’re going to pay for it,” Harris replied. “Because right now, let me tell you something, we’re all paying for healthcare for everyone–”
“No, we’re not,” the woman responded as she became irritated with Harris. “No, we’re not.”
“Leave our healthcare system alone,” the woman told Harris. “We don’t want you to mess with it.”
I love this woman! She let Harris have it and the truth walloped her smug smile right off her face. The slimy politician was bending over to the woman in a condescending manner when she got nailed. Harris could not back peddle and get out of there fast enough.
Nursing home resident slams Kamala Harris' health care plan:
Woman: "you are advocating health care for everyone … who's going to pay for it?"
Harris: "Well, we're going to pay for it"
W: "No we're not. Leave our health care system alone. We don't want you to mess with it" pic.twitter.com/3PphwW3svR
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) August 12, 2019
From The Daily Wire:
“After a brief continued back-and-forth with the woman, Harris said it was “nice to visit” with her before she left the situation.
“Health care has been an issue that Harris has had significant struggles with as she has repeatedly shifted her position on the issue.
“Harris was the first co-sponsor on a 2017 bill from socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) which amounted to a government takeover of the health care system.
“In January, Harris told CNN she wanted to “eliminate” private insurance and to “move on” to a government-controlled system. Hours later after her comments ignited a media firestorm, Harris backed off her statement. In May, Harris claimed that her comments are “not what” she “meant.” In June, Harris flipped again, signaling during one of the Democrat debates that she would eliminate private insurance. Then, a couple of weeks ago, Harris told CNN that she would eliminate employer-based insurance plans.”
In other words, Harris is a liar. She co-sponsored the Medicare for All Act.
“Essentially, we would allow private insurance to offer a plan in the Medicare system, but they will be subject to strict requirements to ensure it lowers costs and expands services,” Harris explained. “If they want to play by our rules, they can be in the system. If not, they have to get out.” How very ‘Godfather’ of her.
“Harris has proposed a Medicare for All health care framework and says she would still allow private insurers to co-exist under her system. Unlike other 2020 candidates, Harris has not put a price tag on her plan, which has drawn criticism and skepticism from her opponents and pundits alike.
“For comparison, Newsweek reported that White House hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) Medicare for All plan carries an estimated price tag of $32 trillion.
“Harris’ plan would be implemented over a ten-year period, and she says over that span she would raise $2 trillion by taxing stock trades, bond trades, and derivative transactions.”
Kamala Harris has flip-flopped repeatedly on healthcare. She covered up her history as a prosecutor, lied about her past, and is a stone-cold communist. But at least in Iowa, a sweet little old lady told her to get stuffed over healthcare. That gives me a happy.
And Harris was still dumb enough to use the encounter as a photo-op. Again, no self-awareness there whatsoever. Hopefully, this evil woman will never get near the White House.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:
Trending Now on Right Wing News
Steve Bannon’s Back And His New Show Is On FIRE! DEMS FREAK OUT!
Stephen K. Bannon, Jason Miller, and Raheem Kassam are joined by guest Rep. Matt Gaetz on their daily show which you can watch live or past shows. It airs daily from 9am-10am EST every single day! www.WarRoom.org
at 23:14 Congressman Gaetz comes live on the show and drops bombs on democrats.
The hosts discuss if “all roads lead to [John] Bolton”, as well as the new White House “informal” war room, the Jim Jordan letter about Saturday depositions, the Graham-McConnell resolution condemning the Democrat’s secretive impeachment inquiry.
Was the resolution watered down, and why?
Matt Gaetz sheds more light on his “storming of the SCIF”, as well as how the MAGA movement needs the “killer class” of 2016 Trump campaign operatives back on the front lines.
VIDEO: Rashida Tlaib: Dems Discussing Arresting Trump Officials
It’s crystal clear..that the left should never ever be allowed into our government. These are dangerous folks.
Maybe Rashida should be arrested for her connections to Islamic terrorists. The fact that this woman is in our government…is despicable!
Via The Daily Wire:
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) stated on Tuesday that House Democrats were discussing behind closed doors how to arrest the members of President Donald Trump’s administration who did not comply with congressional subpoenas.
“Let me tell you, this is pretty — and this is the last caucus conversation we had. Do you know this is really unprecedented? This is the worst time we’ve ever had a situation like this,” Tlaib said during a town hall meeting. “So they’re trying to figure out — no joke — they’re trying to figure out, ‘Well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them?’ No, no.”
“What are we hoping? I mean, I’m not in those kinds of conversations, but I’m asking, like, you know, what happens? And they’re like, ‘Well, Rashida, we’re trying to figure it out ourselves because this is uncharted territory,’” she continued. “No, I’m telling you that they’re trying to be like, ‘Well, where are we going to put them? Where are we going to hold them?’ No, I mean those are the kinds of things they’re trying to tread carefully.”
— America Rising (@AmericaRising) October 4, 2019
Accordingly, in an escalating effort to force White House officials comply with congressional subpoenas, House Democrats have reportedly been reexamining holding those members of the administration in inherent contempt — a power that the legislature has not used since 1935.
The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) explains that inherent contempt is the oldest of three strategies that Congress can use to enforce subpoenas. According to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank:
“Since 1935, Congress has relied on the executive and judicial branches when people refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. This practice makes sense: if Congress cannot get the information it needs on its own authority, then it can rely on the authority of the other branches of government. However, there is another option. Instead of turning to another branch, Congress can legally imprison or fine individuals who refuse to comply.”
Tlaib incorrectly suggested that the process could be enforced by the Washington, D.C. Police Department — the procedure actually only involves the chamber that is concerned. Following a contempt citation, the individual is arrested by the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms, and subsequently brought to the floor for punishment, which may include imprisonment.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW: