Connect with us

‘Dark Secret’ Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed – Spells Total Disaster For Her Kavanaugh Witch Hunt

Published

on

At his rally in Johnson City, Tennessee on Tuesday, President Trump didn’t mince words for California Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding her withholding of Christine Blasey Ford’s letter until the end of the judicial screening process.

RealClearPolitics reports:

“President Trump held a ‘Make America Great Again’ rally Monday night in Johnson City, Tennessee on behalf of Rep. Marsha Blackburn, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate.

Right Side Broadcasting Network reports outside the rally are the “longest lines” they’ve ever seen.”

And President Trump was on a roll at the rally:

“Diane Feinstein, she had this letter for months and she didn’t reveal it until everything was finished,” Trump said. “Then she reveals it and said, ‘Oh we want more time.’ Let’s see how it all works out but I will tell you what – they are trying to destroy a very fine person and we can’t let it happen.”

Indeed, Feinstein has had a letter from Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford in her possession since July; the Palo Alto University professor wrote her senator just after Kavanaugh was nominated. But instead of making the proper authorities aware of Ford’s claims, Feinstein sat on them for six weeks.

During that time, Brett Kavanaugh sat for 65 meetings with various senators, among them, Diane Feinstein. However, the California Democrat never confronted Kavanaugh about Ford’s allegations during any of those meetings. Likewise, she did not bring up Ford’s claims during Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate, as he answered hours and hours worth of questions.

Not until the eve of Kavanaugh’s confirmation, after the Democrats had already exhausted all legitimate means of thwarting the judge, did Feinstein make Ford’s allegations public. This, of course, led many to question the validity of the accuser’s claims.

After all, if there was anything to Ford’s story, why didn’t Feinstein bring it forward sooner? It certainly seemed as though it was all a sleazy political stunt to oust President Trump’s Supreme Court pick.

But this may actually be the least of Feinstein’s worries, thanks to her poor handling of Ford’s case. “There is a well-established process of confidentiality on the committee,” Sen. Tom Cotton told CBS.

“Dianne Feinstein could have shown that letter to Chuck Grassley and the two of them, as the leaders of that committee could have shared it with the FBI who could have discreetly conducted this inquiry in July and in August without betraying Miss Ford’s confidences.”

“Dianne Feinstein and her staff [are] going to face an investigation for why they leaked that,” added Cotton. “All of this could have been done discreetly. It happens hundreds of times — HUNDREDS OF TIMES — every year in the Judiciary Committee.”

Feinstein and her minions were hoping no one would mention the Senate’s well-established process of maintaining the confidentiality of accusers. She could have done this the right way. She could have gone to Grassley and the FBI with Ford’s claims when there was still ample time for them to be investigated before Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing.

The timing of Senator Feinstein’s revealing the letter is suspect at best. While protesters were showing extreme behavior in their demonstrations against Kavanaugh, his confirmation looked all but assured.

Then without warning, Feinstein revealed she had a letter with claims that Kavanaugh had committed sexual assault against someone who wished to remain anonymous. Oddly enough, she also revealed she had been in possession of this letter for nearly 2 months.

The tardiness of the letter also casts a shadow of suspicion against both the Democrats and the accuser. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who is considered a potential swing vote in this process, stated in a New York Times article that:

“What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both the professor and the judge,” she said.

“If they believed Professor Ford, why didn’t they surface this information earlier so that he could be questioned about it? And if they didn’t believe her and chose to withhold the information, why did they decide at the 11th hour to release it? It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled.”

This could potentially backfire on Democrats as Collins is one of the few Republicans that Democrats had hoped to sway into a “no” vote on Kavanaugh. They’ve just taken a lot of wind out of those sails.

You can see the clip here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opjYDE212DA

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Clinton IT aide created Gmail address to forward Hillary’s emails: report

Published

on

...

* By

Continue Reading

New York Times Editor: We’re Switching From Russia Collusion To ‘Trump Is Racist’

Published

on

The New York Times and others have repeatedly tried to take down President Trump with libelous statements on the Russian collusion front and have failed spectacularly every single time. Now, New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet has accidentally admitted that for two years his far-left newspaper was “built” around spreading a hoax. Oops. But it’s never too late to shift propaganda in this political war.

He was secretly recorded saying just that and it got out. Baquet also admitted the Times’ staff is loaded with left-wingers “who cheer us when we take on Donald Trump, but they jeer at us when we take on Joe Biden.” Do tell. I’m shocked I tell you. Simply shocked.

What is actually shocking is this recording comes by way of the leftist rag, Slate. They got their mitts on the recording of a company-wide meeting Baquet held with his staffers and it is an illuminating look at how leftist media utilizes and manipulates propaganda for political effect. Why Slate would let that out is puzzling, to say the least.

Baquet has now admitted that for two long years his leftist newspaper was “built” around the Russia Collusion Hoax: “It got trickier after [inaudible] … went from being a story about whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia and obstruction of justice to being a more head-on story about the president’s character. We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well.”

Truly well? Do you mean by lying and falsifying facts? They did that very well. There was not a shred of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia yet the NYT reported on it as fact for two years and in actuality, made stuff up to fit that narrative.

But the New York Times has seen the light, so to speak. The Russia collusion hoax hasn’t worked so now they are switching tactics… Trump is now a racist and everything will revolve around that lie: “Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story. I’d love your help with that. As Audra Burch said when I talked to her this weekend, this one is a story about what it means to be an American in 2019. It is a story that requires deep investigation into people who peddle hatred[.]”

The truth is that if Trump were actually a racist it would have come out decades ago. This is a last-ditch effort to besmirch a sitting president so a communist can take his place in the next election. It’s subversion and in my book… a form of treason.

You can still taste the salty leftist tears from being disappointed that Mueller did not take down Trump: “The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened. Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.” And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?”

So, while the NYT, WaPo, and other lefty rags spewed lies and propaganda, outlets such as Breitbart, The Daily Wire, and The Daily Caller among others did real reporting and told the truth. For their efforts, a number of them have been banned on social media.

From Breitbart:

“Baquet pretty much spends the rest of the 90 minutes meeting fielding questions from individuals who are supposed to be professionals but who only want to know how they can call Trump and his supporters racists even more often.

“You see, according to the Times’ staff, everything is racist because everything really is racist.

“You probably think that whole “everything is racist” thing is me being sarcastic. Here’s a direct quote from a staffer [emphasis added]:

Hello, I have another question about racism. I’m wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting. Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know? Like these conversations about what is racist, what isn’t racist. I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting. And so, to me, it’s less about the individual instances of racism, and sort of how we’re thinking about racism and white supremacy as the foundation of all of the systems in the country.

“Good grief. What a dispiriting and not-at-all surprising look at the ignorant whack jobs in charge of our media — and in the case of the New York Times, not just the media, but what is considered the elite of the media elite. What are they obsessed with? What do these conspiracy-loons see everywhere in 2019 America…?

“Raaaaaaacism.

“Here we sit in the most tolerant, diverse country in the world just a few years after having twice elected a black president with the middle name “Hussein,” and the people in charge of the media are breaking down into pools of self-pity because they want to scream racist at us even more than they already have.

“And again, let’s not forget that the only way they can try to pretend America is racist is by way of massive hoaxes: the Very Fine People Hoax, the Covington Hoax, the George Zimmerman Is White Hoax, the Hands Up Don’t Shoot Hoax, the Jussie Smollett Hoax, and the countless hoax hate crimes they spread over and over and over again without scrutiny.”

Good grief is an understatement. The NYT does not cover real news anymore like the rising tide of anti-Semitism in this country. They are too busy protecting terrorists and radicals, while smearing the president and conservatives, to do their actual jobs.

The New York Times openly admits that anti-Jewish hate crimes don’t interest the Times because white supremacists are not behind them: “If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy. During the past 22 months, not one person caught or identified as the aggressor in an anti-Semitic hate crime has been associated with a far right-wing group, Mark Molinari, commanding officer of the police department’s Hate Crimes Task Force, told me.”

But young white males are domestic terrorists according to these people. Geez. Not communist Antifa or Black Lives Matter or the Nation of Islam or the Black Panthers… white boys are the ticket, y’all.

Since the media is out of Russian ammo and they detest Trump, they have to have another way of smearing him and throwing the race card is their final desperate move in this political dance. Nothing else has stuck to Teflon-Don. Look for them to cry ‘racism’ non-stop for the next two years in their latest contrived hoax against the president. But you won’t hear them cover actual racism because it does not fit their political narrative. It has to be Trump, Trump, Trump! or it’s not news.

The NYT is a peddler of hate. No wonder they had to stop publishing political cartoons because the editorial staff can’t recognize blatant anti-Semitism. These aren’t journalists anymore… they are Brown Shirts. They feel they’ll get away with calling Trump a racist. After all, they got away with the Russian crap for two years.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend