Connect with us

‘Dark Secret’ Feinstein Was Hiding Just Revealed – Spells Total Disaster For Her Kavanaugh Witch Hunt

Published

on

At his rally in Johnson City, Tennessee on Tuesday, President Trump didn’t mince words for California Senator Dianne Feinstein regarding her withholding of Christine Blasey Ford’s letter until the end of the judicial screening process.

RealClearPolitics reports:

“President Trump held a ‘Make America Great Again’ rally Monday night in Johnson City, Tennessee on behalf of Rep. Marsha Blackburn, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate.

Right Side Broadcasting Network reports outside the rally are the “longest lines” they’ve ever seen.”

And President Trump was on a roll at the rally:

“Diane Feinstein, she had this letter for months and she didn’t reveal it until everything was finished,” Trump said. “Then she reveals it and said, ‘Oh we want more time.’ Let’s see how it all works out but I will tell you what – they are trying to destroy a very fine person and we can’t let it happen.”

Indeed, Feinstein has had a letter from Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford in her possession since July; the Palo Alto University professor wrote her senator just after Kavanaugh was nominated. But instead of making the proper authorities aware of Ford’s claims, Feinstein sat on them for six weeks.

During that time, Brett Kavanaugh sat for 65 meetings with various senators, among them, Diane Feinstein. However, the California Democrat never confronted Kavanaugh about Ford’s allegations during any of those meetings. Likewise, she did not bring up Ford’s claims during Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate, as he answered hours and hours worth of questions.

Not until the eve of Kavanaugh’s confirmation, after the Democrats had already exhausted all legitimate means of thwarting the judge, did Feinstein make Ford’s allegations public. This, of course, led many to question the validity of the accuser’s claims.

After all, if there was anything to Ford’s story, why didn’t Feinstein bring it forward sooner? It certainly seemed as though it was all a sleazy political stunt to oust President Trump’s Supreme Court pick.

But this may actually be the least of Feinstein’s worries, thanks to her poor handling of Ford’s case. “There is a well-established process of confidentiality on the committee,” Sen. Tom Cotton told CBS.

“Dianne Feinstein could have shown that letter to Chuck Grassley and the two of them, as the leaders of that committee could have shared it with the FBI who could have discreetly conducted this inquiry in July and in August without betraying Miss Ford’s confidences.”

“Dianne Feinstein and her staff [are] going to face an investigation for why they leaked that,” added Cotton. “All of this could have been done discreetly. It happens hundreds of times — HUNDREDS OF TIMES — every year in the Judiciary Committee.”

Feinstein and her minions were hoping no one would mention the Senate’s well-established process of maintaining the confidentiality of accusers. She could have done this the right way. She could have gone to Grassley and the FBI with Ford’s claims when there was still ample time for them to be investigated before Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing.

The timing of Senator Feinstein’s revealing the letter is suspect at best. While protesters were showing extreme behavior in their demonstrations against Kavanaugh, his confirmation looked all but assured.

Then without warning, Feinstein revealed she had a letter with claims that Kavanaugh had committed sexual assault against someone who wished to remain anonymous. Oddly enough, she also revealed she had been in possession of this letter for nearly 2 months.

The tardiness of the letter also casts a shadow of suspicion against both the Democrats and the accuser. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who is considered a potential swing vote in this process, stated in a New York Times article that:

“What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both the professor and the judge,” she said.

“If they believed Professor Ford, why didn’t they surface this information earlier so that he could be questioned about it? And if they didn’t believe her and chose to withhold the information, why did they decide at the 11th hour to release it? It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled.”

This could potentially backfire on Democrats as Collins is one of the few Republicans that Democrats had hoped to sway into a “no” vote on Kavanaugh. They’ve just taken a lot of wind out of those sails.

You can see the clip here:

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Kamala Just Made Shocking Sudden Border Announcement – Beto & Gillibrand Panicking

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Daily Caller

Democratic California Sen. Kamala Harris refuted two of her potential 2020 presidential primary challengers on Wednesday when she stated that she does not agree with their acceptance of open borders.

“No, I believe that we need border security,” Harris told “The Daily Show’s” Trevor Noah when asked how she felt about former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke’s call to remove the already standing wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

“We need smart border security. We can’t have open borders, we need to have border security, all nations do,” she continued. “All nations define their borders, but we should not have a policy and perspective that is grounded in keeping people out for the sake of this nationalistic kind of thing this president is trying to push.”

WATCH: 

O’Rourke has long argued against a border wall, despite still claiming to be against open borders. Following President Donald Trump’s executive order in September to erect an 18-foot steel bollard wall to replace the existing pedestrian fencing in El Paso, Texas, the Democrat called the existing chain-link fence “bad enough.”

The failed senatorial candidate later revealed to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that if he could snap his fingers and make his hometown of El Paso’s border wall disappear, he “absolutely” would. O’Rourke insisted in the past that the way to improve border safety and security is to “ensure that we are maximizing the potential from everyone … [and] treating each other with respect and dignity” and referred to Trump’s wall as an “expression of our smallness, our meanness, our fear to the rest of the world.”

Want to build the wall NOW? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter and Instagram!

Democratic New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who launched a presidential exploratory committee in January, signaled her support for tearing down the existing barrier on the border when she was confronted with O’Rourke’s position.

“Well, I’d have to ask folks in that part of the of the country to see whether the fencing that exists today is helpful or unhelpful,” Gillibrand replied in February when asked about O’Rourke’s comments. “But, you know, Democrats are not afraid of national security or border security.”

“And [the wall] is a hateful message. I mean [Trump’s] trying to create a picture of division and hate and derision. And that’s what I’m so offended by — the fact that he’s fused this kind of racism in, ‎in his words and actions is just troubling,” she continued. “So, I could look at it and see which part he means and why and if it makes sense I could support it.”

Neither Gillibrand nor O’Rourke have officially entered the 2020 presidential race.

Want to build the wall NOW? Follow Amanda Shea on Twitter and Instagram!

Read more on Daily Caller

Continue Reading

Trump Just Blindsided Congress By Demolishing New Plan To Stop Border Wall

Published

on

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service in the world, RWN offers the following information published by: Patriot Journal

Democrats thought they could open the border up – but Donald is ready for them.

The wall is getting built whether the Left likes it or not.

Trump has made it clear that he is going to do whatever it takes to protect the country, and has declared a National Emergency at the border to get the funds necessary to build the wall.

Anyone with common sense can see the border crisis is an emergency—am I right?! Every day, drugs and criminals are pouring in and putting American lives at risk.

But the Democrats don’t care and are determined to keep fighting against the country’s interests.

Time Magazine reports:

House Democrats plan to file a resolution as soon as Friday that’s aimed at blocking President Donald Trump’s declaration of an emergency at the Southwest border.

Passage by the Democratic-run House seems likely. The measure would then move to the Republican-controlled Senate, where there may be enough GOP defections for approval.

Trump has promised a veto, which would be difficult for Congress to override.

Trump predicted the Democrats would try to block his emergency declaration, and once again he’s been proven right.

But the President also predicts that he will win if the case makes it to the Supreme Court, just like he won the travel ban case.

Even if the resolution to block the declaration makes it through the House and Senate, the President will veto it, and there’s no way the resolution will make it through with a Republican majority.

Rep. Jim Jordan told reporters that he believes there are enough GOP votes in Congress to prevent the two-thirds supermajorities required to overcome a veto in both the House and the  Senate.

“I think there are plenty of votes in the House to make sure that there’s no override of the president’s veto,” he said. “So it’s going to be settled in court, we’ll have to wait and see.”

Liberals may not care about saving American lives, but Trump will shut down any effort they make to keep our border unsecured.

Read more at Patriot Journal

Continue Reading
[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend