Connect with us

Christine Ford’s Lawyers Just Admitted That She Lied Under Oath – YUGE!!!!

Published

on

The Supreme Court nomination process is over. Justice Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court. However, that was not without a lot of controversy and sexual assault allegations.

Lawyers for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford have now released statements regarding the confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh. Some of those comments though contradict Dr. Ford’s initial statements. Which means they are admitting she might have lied.

Red State Watcher reported,

“Now that Judge Kavanaugh has been confirmed, It appears that Christine Ford’s lawyers are admitting she never had any fear of flying. As reported by kagfeed.com: As Ford’s lawyers find themselves in hot water, due to a discovery that they did not advise their client that Senate investigators were willing to come to her to take her testimony, they’re spinning the story to avoid retribution from the Senate and American Bar Association.

Now, the lawyers are saying that Ford’s so-called “fear of flying” was not the reason she wanted to postpone the hearing, even though it was widely reported in the news, and also discussed during the actual hearing with Dr. Ford under oath.

Daily Wire:

In their statement regarding “lies” being spread about Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony, her attorneys said they never told the Senate Judiciary Committee that she could not travel to Washington, D.C. due to a fear of flying.

Ford was asked to provide testimony to the committee about her allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, whom she claimed sexually assaulted her 36 years ago. Prior to her attending the public hearing on September 27, it was revealed that Ford had a fear of flying and it was suggested that she would have to drive to the hearing because of it.


Click Here To Get Your Justice Kavanaugh T-Shirt Now!!!

Let’s explore in detail. On September 21, Politico published an article about Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) giving Ford and her attorneys more time to decide when, where, and how to testify for the committee. Buried in the article was the following:

“The GOP has been told that Ford does not want to fly from her California home to Washington, according to the Republican senator, which means she may need to drive across the country. Ford has reportedly told friends she is uncomfortable in confined spaces, indicating a physical difficulty in making the trip by plane.”

Politico reporter Burgess Everett tweeted the following when promoting the article: On September 23, CNN interviewed friends of Ford who claimed she had a fear of enclosed spaces that didn’t have multiple exits, such as a plane. These friends were allowed to claim, without evidence, that this was due to Ford’s alleged encounter with Kavanaugh 36 years earlier.

Kate DeVarney, one of Kavanaugh’s friends, told the outlet that Ford “really has a hard time being in a place where there’s no escape route.” She added that Ford did not like to fly because an airplane was “the ultimate closed space where you cannot get away.”

On September 27, Ford was asked about her fear of flying by sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell. Ford said she came to Washington, D.C. to testify by taking a plane. The followed exchange occurred:

MITCHELL: OK. It’s — I ask that, because it’s been reported by the press that you would not submit to an interview with the committee because of your fear of flying. Is — is that true?

FORD: Well, I was willing — I was hoping that they would come to me, but then I realized that was an unrealistic request.

MITCHELL: It would’ve been a quicker trip for me.

FORD: Yes. So that was certainly what I was hoping, was to avoid having to get on an airplane, but I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends, and get on the plane.

Mitchell then asked a series of questions establishing that Ford flew quite often for work and vacation, including to the mid-Atlantic area, Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific islands, and French Polynesia. Ford said she had flown to all those locations, but insisted it was “Easier for me to travel going that direction when it’s a vacation.”

Hmmmmmm, sounds pretty fishy! What are your thoughts? Please share and comment with your opinions.”

Dr. Ford testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding her allegations that Justice Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee asked questions, as did a female sex crimes prosecutor who was chosen by Senator Chuck Grassley who is Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. While at the Committee hearing, Dr. Ford had her attorney’s present with her.

After the hearing, the Committee voted on whether to proceed with the nomination and allow the full Senate to vote. This was approved despite the non-votes of two senators, Senator Cory Booker and Senator Kamala Harris. When the vote came to the floor for cloture, it passed. When the final vote came to the Senate Floor, it passed as well.

Shortly after the confirmation took place President Trump signed Justice Kavanaugh’s appointment and swore him in. Despite the allegations and alleged lies by Dr. Ford and the other accusers, Justice Kavanaugh is now on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Share if you agree that Justice Kavanaugh is innocent.

Share if you believe that Dr. Ford’s statements and testimony are not believable.

Share if you think that what Democrats did to the Supreme Court Justice nomination process was despicable.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


House Dems: Trump’s ‘Go Back’ Comments ‘Politically Brilliant – He Won This One’ – CNN

Published

on

...

* By

You gotta love how the left and Never Trumpers focus on “Send her back!” chant..yet. you hear nothing about the terror attacks committed by Antifa. Nothing wrong with the chant. The American people are tired of the constant anti-American hatred spewed by the left on a daily basis.

Trump supporters have been insulted, beaten, spit on, kicked out of restaurants and harassed daily. Since Trump has been in office…conservatives have been called every name in the book. Nazis, fascists, racists, bigots. But the left and never Trumpers want to focus on a chant. It’s amazing how the left is given a free pass on everything they do.

If you severely hate this country..do us a favor…leave!

Via The Daily Wire:

According to CNN, multiple House Democrats “from across the political spectrum” are “extremely frustrated” by the heightened focus on the so-called “Squad” of far-left freshmen Democrats, a development forced by President Trump’s escalating rhetoric against them in a move one of the lawmakers described as “politically brilliant.”

In a report published Wednesday after the Trump rally in North Carolina — which included a headline-grabbing moment in which some in the crowd began to chant “Send her back!” in response to Trump’s criticism of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for her “vicious anti-Semitic screeds” — CNN’s Jake Tapper and Dana Bash reported on the growing frustration among some of the House Democrats over the increased prominence of the “Squad”: Reps. Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA).

The conversations with several Democrats, whom Tapper and Bash stress span the political spectrum, took place over the last few days — and before the North Carolina rally.

“The President won this one,” one House Democrat told CNN in reference to Trump’s focus on the Squad and the Democrats vote Tuesday to condemn his “go back” comments. “What the President has done is politically brilliant. Pelosi was trying to marginalize these folks, and the President has now identified the entire party with them.”

“The President’s words and actions speak for themselves,” said another. “We need to focus on the issues that got (Democrats) here: jobs, health care … instead of the issues the President brings up deliberately. Anything that takes away from bread-and-butter issues is playing into his hands.”

Another “frustrated” Democratic lawmaker made clear to CNN that many on the left side of the aisle are “angry and annoyed” by The Squad’s attacks on members of their own party. “I can’t tell you the number of members who are angry and annoyed about them criticizing us,” the congressional member said.

The sharp escalation of the battle between Trump and the Squad began last week when the president came to the defense of Pelosi after Ocasio-Cortez suggested that the speaker’s rebuke of the Squad for portraying fellow Democrats as pro-segregation might have a racial component. Continue Reading

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Dem Congressman Wants To Ban The Phrase ‘Illegal Alien’ From Gov’t Code

Published

on

Texas Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro, the twin to Julian Castro who is running on the Democratic ticket for president in 2020, is moving to strike the words “alien” and “illegal alien” from the government’s legal code, arguing that the terms are hurtful to the immigrant community. I think what ruffles him most is the word ‘illegal’ which they are.

“Words matter. It’s vital that we respect the dignity of immigrants fleeing violence and prosecution in our language. The words ‘alien’ and ‘illegal alien’ work to demonize and dehumanize the migrant community. They should have no place in our government’s description of human beings,” Castro stated. What part of ‘illegal’ doesn’t this guy get?

The Correcting Alienating Names in Government Act, otherwise known as the CHANGE Act (figures), seeks to strike those two words from the Immigration and Nationality Act and to replace them with the words “foreign national” and “undocumented foreign national.” The excuse du jour here is that it would make illegal immigrants safer and humanize them. What a load of horse manure. It’s evidently inhumane to accuse someone of breaking the law when that is exactly what they are doing.

“Immigrants come to our borders in good faith and work hard for the opportunity to achieve a better life for themselves and their family. Eliminating this language from government expression puts us one step closer to preserving their dignity and ensuring their safety,” Castro went on in a released statement.

From The Daily Caller:

“Castro is far from the only Democratic congressman to believe the words “illegal alien” are offensive.

“First, no one is illegal. That term is derogatory now because it dehumanizes people. You can say any other forms of maybe ‘coming in without any regulations’ or so forth, but the use of ‘illegal’ is disrespectful and I ask my colleagues to try in so many ways to not dehumanize our immigrant neighbors who are trying to come in for safe haven,” Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib said during a House committee hearing on July 12.

“No one is an ‘alien.’ This is family separation on a massive scale,” Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted in June. “Dehumanizing immigrants and tearing apart families will not make us any stronger. It will only destroy lives, traumatize children, and make our country less safe.”

“Omar said President Donald Trump uses the words “illegal” and “alien” to “justify horrific human rights abuses against migrants.”

“No one is an ‘alien.’ This is family separation on a massive scale,” Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted in June. “Dehumanizing immigrants and tearing apart families will not make us any stronger. It will only destroy lives, traumatize children, and make our country less safe.”

“Omar said President Donald Trump uses the words “illegal” and “alien” to “justify horrific human rights abuses against migrants.”

“Despite criticism from Democratic politicians, most Americans are still very comfortable with the word. Only 26% of respondents to a June Rasmussen poll answered “yes” when asked, “Is it offensive to refer to someone who has entered this country illegally as ‘an illegal immigrant’?” including only 30% of Democrats.”

I think the labels ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegal immigrant’ are very accurate. Most Americans agree with me.

It’s no surprise that Joaquin’s twin brother agrees with this move. Marxists of a feather and all that. But Americans, in general, won’t go for it and it will never get through Congress.

The Associated Press stylebook removed usage of the term “illegal immigrant” in 2013, saying that “illegal” should “describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally.” The AP also rejected the usage of “illegal alien” as well as “undocumented,” which it said was not an accurate term. And this is one of the main reasons that Americans no longer trust the mainstream media – they don’t like being manipulated like this.

Townhall says that PJ Media’s Tyler O’Neil accurately describes the bill as if it is something right out of 1984. And he is right.

“Democrats have launched an assault on basic language when it comes to immigration issues. They have demonized the Trump administration, blaming it for putting “kids in cages” — something that only happened on Obama’s watch — and for enforcing immigration law.

“Democrats have insisted that “no one is illegal,” even if they break U.S. law to enter the country. This involves an Orwellian redefinition of immigration — claiming immigrants cannot be “illegal” because to be illegal is supposedly less than human.”

Remember, the left did the same thing in regards to radical Islamism – when Obama was in charge, the DoD and other agencies scrubbed terminology that the left claimed was offensive to Muslims. Terms that actually were used to describe terrorists. This is yet another instance of word-burning… censorship to fit a political narrative. 1984 indeed.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend