Connect with us

Celeb Alyssa Milano Trashes Purple Heart Hero For Wall Fund – Realizes BIG Mistake Too Late

Published

on

Triple-amputee vet Brian Kolfage started raising money to build President Trump’s wall on Monday. In three short days, at the time of this article, Airman Kolfage had raised over $9 million and that number is rising fast.

Most everyone was stunned that that much money had been raised in that short amount of time, but Americans want the wall, and Airman Kolfage saw a way to get it built despite congressional Democrats blocking Trump’s efforts to begin construction.

Of course, the triple-amputee veteran’s actions triggered the left. They’re crying about it all over social media. Enter has-been actress Alyssa Milano who everyone loved before she stuck her nose into politics.

Milano tweeted about Kolfage’s wall funding project:

“Oh, yes! Let’s #GoFundTheWall while not taking care of our veterans. Cool. Cool. Cool.”

Apparently Milano is unaware that Kolfage himself is a veteran, not only that, but he is the most severely wounded Airman to survive any war. The triple-amputee travels the country, attending events to raise money for other severely wounded vets. He also sits on the boards of several veterans charities.

One Twitter user called out Milano, tweeting:

“Hey, Alyssa…the GoFundMe page was started by @BrianKolfage, a triple amputee veteran who was blown up while fighting in Iraq. He does more to help injured veterans in one day than your obnoxious tweet ever could. #AnotherIrrelevantHollywoodVoice #GoFundTheWall”

Shortly after Kolfage’s wall funding effort went viral, a transgender person started a GoFundMe for ladders to get over Trump’s wall. Milano retweeted the fundraiser to her Twitter account.

The transgender, Charlotte Clymer, is actually an Army vet, and is extremely anti-Trump, and anything Republican. She tweeted this the other day:

“If you support a party that is anti-LGBTQ and anti-woman and xenophobic and white supremacist because you think your taxes are too high, you are not “socially liberal”.”

Milano is seen with Clymer in this Instagram photo from September.

View this post on Instagram

We came to be heard. #BelieveSurvivors

A post shared by Charlotte Clymer (@cmclymer) on

Milano is not known to be affiliated with the anti-Kolfage “Ladders to Get Over Trump’s Wall” GoFundMe, yet. Although she is promoting it. The ladder fundraiser has taken in about $50,000. Which shows you how much more people want the wall. Almost $10 million raised for the wall in three days vs $50k for ladders raised in one.

Milano tried to blame President Trump for migrant deaths in a recent op-ed for The Guardian UK. She penned the piece in reference to the 7-year-old migrant girl who died after her father didn’t tell the Border Patrol she was sick. Milano wrote in part:

“The White House also took no responsibility, instead blaming Cruz for his daughter’s death. These are the architects of a system that routinely leaves immigrants no option but to cross through the desert. An immigration system that restricts legal entry and then ensures dehydration and detention for those who cross otherwise will naturally have fatal results. In fact, the system is intended to heighten these dangers and then broadcast them to those who would follow. The deaths themselves are the deterrent.”

WE ARE FUNDING THE WALL with GO FUND ME- CLICK BELOW!

Milano is just pro-illegal immigration and anti-American. For her to call out Airman Kolfage’s efforts to fund the construction of the wall & say we’re not taking care of veterans is ludicrous. Kolfage does plenty to help his fellow wounded veterans, and President Trump has done amazing work revamping the VA system, already getting rid of 3600 employees who weren’t giving vets the care they need.

Milano is just a screeching has-been lemming actress trying to stay relevant. She has nothing on Airman Kolfage, other wounded vets, or those who want to fund the wall so we can keep Americans safe and prevent any more Kate Steinles from happening.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Clinton IT aide created Gmail address to forward Hillary’s emails: report

Published

on

...

* By

Continue Reading

New York Times Editor: We’re Switching From Russia Collusion To ‘Trump Is Racist’

Published

on

The New York Times and others have repeatedly tried to take down President Trump with libelous statements on the Russian collusion front and have failed spectacularly every single time. Now, New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet has accidentally admitted that for two years his far-left newspaper was “built” around spreading a hoax. Oops. But it’s never too late to shift propaganda in this political war.

He was secretly recorded saying just that and it got out. Baquet also admitted the Times’ staff is loaded with left-wingers “who cheer us when we take on Donald Trump, but they jeer at us when we take on Joe Biden.” Do tell. I’m shocked I tell you. Simply shocked.

What is actually shocking is this recording comes by way of the leftist rag, Slate. They got their mitts on the recording of a company-wide meeting Baquet held with his staffers and it is an illuminating look at how leftist media utilizes and manipulates propaganda for political effect. Why Slate would let that out is puzzling, to say the least.

Baquet has now admitted that for two long years his leftist newspaper was “built” around the Russia Collusion Hoax: “It got trickier after [inaudible] … went from being a story about whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia and obstruction of justice to being a more head-on story about the president’s character. We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well.”

Truly well? Do you mean by lying and falsifying facts? They did that very well. There was not a shred of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia yet the NYT reported on it as fact for two years and in actuality, made stuff up to fit that narrative.

But the New York Times has seen the light, so to speak. The Russia collusion hoax hasn’t worked so now they are switching tactics… Trump is now a racist and everything will revolve around that lie: “Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story. I’d love your help with that. As Audra Burch said when I talked to her this weekend, this one is a story about what it means to be an American in 2019. It is a story that requires deep investigation into people who peddle hatred[.]”

The truth is that if Trump were actually a racist it would have come out decades ago. This is a last-ditch effort to besmirch a sitting president so a communist can take his place in the next election. It’s subversion and in my book… a form of treason.

You can still taste the salty leftist tears from being disappointed that Mueller did not take down Trump: “The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened. Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.” And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?”

So, while the NYT, WaPo, and other lefty rags spewed lies and propaganda, outlets such as Breitbart, The Daily Wire, and The Daily Caller among others did real reporting and told the truth. For their efforts, a number of them have been banned on social media.

From Breitbart:

“Baquet pretty much spends the rest of the 90 minutes meeting fielding questions from individuals who are supposed to be professionals but who only want to know how they can call Trump and his supporters racists even more often.

“You see, according to the Times’ staff, everything is racist because everything really is racist.

“You probably think that whole “everything is racist” thing is me being sarcastic. Here’s a direct quote from a staffer [emphasis added]:

Hello, I have another question about racism. I’m wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting. Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know? Like these conversations about what is racist, what isn’t racist. I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting. And so, to me, it’s less about the individual instances of racism, and sort of how we’re thinking about racism and white supremacy as the foundation of all of the systems in the country.

“Good grief. What a dispiriting and not-at-all surprising look at the ignorant whack jobs in charge of our media — and in the case of the New York Times, not just the media, but what is considered the elite of the media elite. What are they obsessed with? What do these conspiracy-loons see everywhere in 2019 America…?

“Raaaaaaacism.

“Here we sit in the most tolerant, diverse country in the world just a few years after having twice elected a black president with the middle name “Hussein,” and the people in charge of the media are breaking down into pools of self-pity because they want to scream racist at us even more than they already have.

“And again, let’s not forget that the only way they can try to pretend America is racist is by way of massive hoaxes: the Very Fine People Hoax, the Covington Hoax, the George Zimmerman Is White Hoax, the Hands Up Don’t Shoot Hoax, the Jussie Smollett Hoax, and the countless hoax hate crimes they spread over and over and over again without scrutiny.”

Good grief is an understatement. The NYT does not cover real news anymore like the rising tide of anti-Semitism in this country. They are too busy protecting terrorists and radicals, while smearing the president and conservatives, to do their actual jobs.

The New York Times openly admits that anti-Jewish hate crimes don’t interest the Times because white supremacists are not behind them: “If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy. During the past 22 months, not one person caught or identified as the aggressor in an anti-Semitic hate crime has been associated with a far right-wing group, Mark Molinari, commanding officer of the police department’s Hate Crimes Task Force, told me.”

But young white males are domestic terrorists according to these people. Geez. Not communist Antifa or Black Lives Matter or the Nation of Islam or the Black Panthers… white boys are the ticket, y’all.

Since the media is out of Russian ammo and they detest Trump, they have to have another way of smearing him and throwing the race card is their final desperate move in this political dance. Nothing else has stuck to Teflon-Don. Look for them to cry ‘racism’ non-stop for the next two years in their latest contrived hoax against the president. But you won’t hear them cover actual racism because it does not fit their political narrative. It has to be Trump, Trump, Trump! or it’s not news.

The NYT is a peddler of hate. No wonder they had to stop publishing political cartoons because the editorial staff can’t recognize blatant anti-Semitism. These aren’t journalists anymore… they are Brown Shirts. They feel they’ll get away with calling Trump a racist. After all, they got away with the Russian crap for two years.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend