Connect with us

BREAKING: Kavanaugh Accuser REFUSES to Speak Under Oath, Wants FBI Investigation

Published

on

Deborah Ramirez, a Yale University classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, is refusing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee about her accusation against Kavanaugh, a GOP lawmaker said Tuesday.

Ramirez lawyer John Clune tweeted Tuesday that “We have been working hard to cooperate with the Senate Judiciary Committee…and they have refused to meet all scheduled appointments.” He said Ramirez wants an FBI investigation, not a congressional investigation, and is willing to “swear to the FBI under penalty of perjury.”

A top Judiciary Committee GOP aide told the Washington Examiner in response to the Clune claim, “The Ramirez legal team has declined to comply with the committee’s established process and investigation and seem to prefer working through the media.”

Clune is scheduled to appear on CNN tonight.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., who sits on the committee, said a lawyer for Ramirez told committee staff she would not speak to them about her allegation that Kavanaugh flashed his naked groin in her face during an alcohol-laden party their freshman year. Ramirez made the accusation in a blockbuster Sunday night New Yorker story.

“Our counsel repeatedly tried to reach him,” Kennedy said of Ramirez’s lawyer. “They finally did reach him, and he said we are not issuing a statement. He said if you want our statement, read the New Yorker.”

Lawmakers, including Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a key swing vote, have said they want to hear from Ramirez about her accusation. But talking to committee staff is the first step to testifying in the committee.

Democrats want the FBI to probe the matter, and Ramirez said she also supported an FBI investigation.

Republicans said they don’t believe one is necessary and point to gaps in her story and lack of first-hand witnesses.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to meet Thursday to hear from the first woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault, Christine Blasey Ford. Republicans are expected to quickly move to confirm Kavanaugh in the days following the hearing.

More on Ramirez, via Daily Wire:

In a new report published on Sunday, a 53-year-old registered Democrat made new allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh from his college days — allegations which come just as doubts continue to grow over allegations made by Christine Blasey Ford.

Deborah Ramirez, who studied sociology and psychology at Yale with Kavanaugh, outlined her accusations to The New Yorker after the left-wing publication contacted her, acting on a tip about a possible incident.

Continued:

Ramirez said that she was not politically motivated to come forward but that she “works toward human rights, social justice, and social change.”

“In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty,” The New Yorker reports. “After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.”

An excerpt from New Yorker via Twitchy:

After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.

In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, “This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name–and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building–against these last-minute allegations.”

White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec said the administration stood by Kavanaugh. “This 35-year-old, uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the Democrats designed to tear down a good man. This claim is denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew Judge Kavanaugh at the time in college say. The White House stands firmly behind Judge Kavanaugh.”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


House Dems: Trump’s ‘Go Back’ Comments ‘Politically Brilliant – He Won This One’ – CNN

Published

on

...

* By

You gotta love how the left and Never Trumpers focus on “Send her back!” chant..yet. you hear nothing about the terror attacks committed by Antifa. Nothing wrong with the chant. The American people are tired of the constant anti-American hatred spewed by the left on a daily basis.

Trump supporters have been insulted, beaten, spit on, kicked out of restaurants and harassed daily. Since Trump has been in office…conservatives have been called every name in the book. Nazis, fascists, racists, bigots. But the left and never Trumpers want to focus on a chant. It’s amazing how the left is given a free pass on everything they do.

If you severely hate this country..do us a favor…leave!

Via The Daily Wire:

According to CNN, multiple House Democrats “from across the political spectrum” are “extremely frustrated” by the heightened focus on the so-called “Squad” of far-left freshmen Democrats, a development forced by President Trump’s escalating rhetoric against them in a move one of the lawmakers described as “politically brilliant.”

In a report published Wednesday after the Trump rally in North Carolina — which included a headline-grabbing moment in which some in the crowd began to chant “Send her back!” in response to Trump’s criticism of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for her “vicious anti-Semitic screeds” — CNN’s Jake Tapper and Dana Bash reported on the growing frustration among some of the House Democrats over the increased prominence of the “Squad”: Reps. Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA).

The conversations with several Democrats, whom Tapper and Bash stress span the political spectrum, took place over the last few days — and before the North Carolina rally.

“The President won this one,” one House Democrat told CNN in reference to Trump’s focus on the Squad and the Democrats vote Tuesday to condemn his “go back” comments. “What the President has done is politically brilliant. Pelosi was trying to marginalize these folks, and the President has now identified the entire party with them.”

“The President’s words and actions speak for themselves,” said another. “We need to focus on the issues that got (Democrats) here: jobs, health care … instead of the issues the President brings up deliberately. Anything that takes away from bread-and-butter issues is playing into his hands.”

Another “frustrated” Democratic lawmaker made clear to CNN that many on the left side of the aisle are “angry and annoyed” by The Squad’s attacks on members of their own party. “I can’t tell you the number of members who are angry and annoyed about them criticizing us,” the congressional member said.

The sharp escalation of the battle between Trump and the Squad began last week when the president came to the defense of Pelosi after Ocasio-Cortez suggested that the speaker’s rebuke of the Squad for portraying fellow Democrats as pro-segregation might have a racial component. Continue Reading

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Dem Congressman Wants To Ban The Phrase ‘Illegal Alien’ From Gov’t Code

Published

on

Texas Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro, the twin to Julian Castro who is running on the Democratic ticket for president in 2020, is moving to strike the words “alien” and “illegal alien” from the government’s legal code, arguing that the terms are hurtful to the immigrant community. I think what ruffles him most is the word ‘illegal’ which they are.

“Words matter. It’s vital that we respect the dignity of immigrants fleeing violence and prosecution in our language. The words ‘alien’ and ‘illegal alien’ work to demonize and dehumanize the migrant community. They should have no place in our government’s description of human beings,” Castro stated. What part of ‘illegal’ doesn’t this guy get?

The Correcting Alienating Names in Government Act, otherwise known as the CHANGE Act (figures), seeks to strike those two words from the Immigration and Nationality Act and to replace them with the words “foreign national” and “undocumented foreign national.” The excuse du jour here is that it would make illegal immigrants safer and humanize them. What a load of horse manure. It’s evidently inhumane to accuse someone of breaking the law when that is exactly what they are doing.

“Immigrants come to our borders in good faith and work hard for the opportunity to achieve a better life for themselves and their family. Eliminating this language from government expression puts us one step closer to preserving their dignity and ensuring their safety,” Castro went on in a released statement.

From The Daily Caller:

“Castro is far from the only Democratic congressman to believe the words “illegal alien” are offensive.

“First, no one is illegal. That term is derogatory now because it dehumanizes people. You can say any other forms of maybe ‘coming in without any regulations’ or so forth, but the use of ‘illegal’ is disrespectful and I ask my colleagues to try in so many ways to not dehumanize our immigrant neighbors who are trying to come in for safe haven,” Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib said during a House committee hearing on July 12.

“No one is an ‘alien.’ This is family separation on a massive scale,” Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted in June. “Dehumanizing immigrants and tearing apart families will not make us any stronger. It will only destroy lives, traumatize children, and make our country less safe.”

“Omar said President Donald Trump uses the words “illegal” and “alien” to “justify horrific human rights abuses against migrants.”

“No one is an ‘alien.’ This is family separation on a massive scale,” Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted in June. “Dehumanizing immigrants and tearing apart families will not make us any stronger. It will only destroy lives, traumatize children, and make our country less safe.”

“Omar said President Donald Trump uses the words “illegal” and “alien” to “justify horrific human rights abuses against migrants.”

“Despite criticism from Democratic politicians, most Americans are still very comfortable with the word. Only 26% of respondents to a June Rasmussen poll answered “yes” when asked, “Is it offensive to refer to someone who has entered this country illegally as ‘an illegal immigrant’?” including only 30% of Democrats.”

I think the labels ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegal immigrant’ are very accurate. Most Americans agree with me.

It’s no surprise that Joaquin’s twin brother agrees with this move. Marxists of a feather and all that. But Americans, in general, won’t go for it and it will never get through Congress.

The Associated Press stylebook removed usage of the term “illegal immigrant” in 2013, saying that “illegal” should “describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally.” The AP also rejected the usage of “illegal alien” as well as “undocumented,” which it said was not an accurate term. And this is one of the main reasons that Americans no longer trust the mainstream media – they don’t like being manipulated like this.

Townhall says that PJ Media’s Tyler O’Neil accurately describes the bill as if it is something right out of 1984. And he is right.

“Democrats have launched an assault on basic language when it comes to immigration issues. They have demonized the Trump administration, blaming it for putting “kids in cages” — something that only happened on Obama’s watch — and for enforcing immigration law.

“Democrats have insisted that “no one is illegal,” even if they break U.S. law to enter the country. This involves an Orwellian redefinition of immigration — claiming immigrants cannot be “illegal” because to be illegal is supposedly less than human.”

Remember, the left did the same thing in regards to radical Islamism – when Obama was in charge, the DoD and other agencies scrubbed terminology that the left claimed was offensive to Muslims. Terms that actually were used to describe terrorists. This is yet another instance of word-burning… censorship to fit a political narrative. 1984 indeed.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend