Connect with us

Prosecutor Blindsided Kavanaugh Accuser With Massive Legal Verdict

Published

on

Democrats have been hit with several surprising twists and turns in the last couple of days in this political drama of a latest alleged sexual scandal. However, they definitely didn’t see the judgement GOP prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Dr. Ford at the hearing, was about to hand down.

Over the last two day, Americans have watched history unfold before our eyes as everyone was glued to whatever device they could get the Brett Kavanaugh/Christine Blasey Ford hearing on. The intensely emotional testimonies, grilling, and debate played out better than anything Hollywood could create, but came to a shocking delayed resolve on Friday.

A clear “winner” between the accuser and accused was supposed to be decided today at 1:30pm eastern time. It was a tight competition for the decision between Democrats and Conservatives in the Senate, despite Dr. Ford’s substantial lack in details on the allegation of sexual assault she was using against Judge Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s future, one that he’s worked his entire life to achieve a seat in the highest court in the country, was in the hands of all Senate members.

The first full day of the hearing on Thursday proved the new low our nation has come to, especially the Senate. Sexual allegations have become the “new norm” seemingly as a tactic of the lest to detail a decision they disagree with. It’s repulsive and it ruins lives. These unfounded allegations get far too much attention, only perpetuating the problem that puts democracy in peril.

The depraved antics we witnessed yesterday has ruined the reputation of a good, fair, and accomplished man, regardless if he’s ultimately appointed and exonerated, or not. His wife and children have lived through an unrcontionable ordeal that they will be reminded of with jabs and questions the rest of their lives.

This all came from a questionable woman’s vague and distant memory of a situation in which she can’t substantiate with details or verifiable facts. Even the four people she named as being there, one of which was a very close friend of hers, said they were not at the party where the alleged assault took place and have no recollection of ever being at such an event like this that Dr. Ford described.

Yet, here we are, going into another full week without a decision so the FBI can investigate the seemingly unstable woman’s non-corroborated memory of an alleged attack where she even went as far as to claim that she thought Kavanaugh might accidentally kill her.

Dr. Ford told “her truth” before the Senate Judiciary Committee and hundreds of thousands of Americans watching. But more importantly, she had to answer to Rachel Mitchell, a career sex crimes prosecutor, and seemed to come up very short and inconsistent on important questions the prosecutor hit her with.

After approximately four hours of Dr. Ford speaking and answering questions, Kavanaugh had his chance to defend his good name. Once he was done sharing his emotional and moving defense, Mitchell gave her verdict. Democrats were not happy.

Wired Sources reports the outcome of Mitchell’s shocking decision:

https://twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1045506984378863616

Senator Lindsey Graham echoed the same important fact in his statements, having spent much of his life in law, including as a prosecutor. Lacking this evidence means that there’s no way of proving “probably cause” and showing reason “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that’s necessary for action against the accused.

Kavanaugh, a Constitutional judge, was not treated with the rights owed to him as an American. He was presumed guilty until proven innocent and the left wasn’t going to let him prove he was, despite nothing but a distant, and well timed, memory to go off of.

Without investigation, trial, and evidence, a woman from 36 years ago was given the pass to demolish this man and his family’s life, with the potential of rendering him unemployable as a law professor and judge, even if he didn’t make it onto the Supreme Court.

Regardless of what is ultimately decided on the Senate floor, following the FBI’s unnecessary investigation, this good man’s life will never be the same. Neither will his innocent family’s.

The man who has spent decades delivering justice was deprived that very right by Democrats who imposed what seemed to be an 11th hour plan the delay or demolish his confirmation onto the Supreme Court. Thankfully, Mitchell saw through the charade and was fair and honest, prioritized facts, details and respected the due process Kavanaugh deserves.

Ford’s confused story lacking the most important facts of when, where, proving who, and witness testimony, wouldn’t have even have a chance to hold up in court. So it shouldn’t have ever been allowed to hold up a confirmation of a Supreme Court judge. As such, Mitchell did the honorable thing of not even pressing this case since it’s simply a pointless distraction.

Democrats have reached a deep new low by either giving this claim any credence at all or creating the scandal themselves. This is a national disgrace and proof that to the left, politics are not about bettering our country, it’s about strengthening their power and perhaps their pocketbooks after doing so.

This desperation move with Dr. Ford as their tool was not ironic on timing, considering the midterm elections are right around the corner. They have the opportunity to reclaim control of Congress and have proven nothing and nobody is off limits to get to that goal.

It’s never been more important than now for Republicans or liberty-loving/anti-scandal Americans to flood the polls with our votes. Passivity in doing so only passes power to people who don’t have your best interest in mind in your pursuit of happiness.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Steve Bannon’s Back And His New Show Is On FIRE! DEMS FREAK OUT!

Published

on

...

* By

Stephen K. Bannon, Jason Miller, and Raheem Kassam are joined by guest Rep. Matt Gaetz on their daily show which you can watch live or past shows. It airs daily from 9am-10am EST every single day! www.WarRoom.org

at 23:14 Congressman Gaetz comes live on the show and drops bombs on democrats.

The hosts discuss if “all roads lead to [John] Bolton”, as well as the new White House “informal” war room, the Jim Jordan letter about Saturday depositions, the Graham-McConnell resolution condemning the Democrat’s secretive impeachment inquiry.

Was the resolution watered down, and why?

Matt Gaetz sheds more light on his “storming of the SCIF”, as well as how the MAGA movement needs the “killer class” of 2016 Trump campaign operatives back on the front lines.

Continue Reading

VIDEO: Rashida Tlaib: Dems Discussing Arresting Trump Officials

Published

on

...

* By

It’s crystal clear..that the left should never ever be allowed into our government. These are dangerous folks.

Maybe Rashida should be arrested for her connections to Islamic terrorists. The fact that this woman is in our government…is despicable!

Via The Daily Wire:

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) stated on Tuesday that House Democrats were discussing behind closed doors how to arrest the members of President Donald Trump’s administration who did not comply with congressional subpoenas.

“Let me tell you, this is pretty — and this is the last caucus conversation we had. Do you know this is really unprecedented? This is the worst time we’ve ever had a situation like this,” Tlaib said during a town hall meeting. “So they’re trying to figure out — no joke — they’re trying to figure out, ‘Well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them?’ No, no.”

“What are we hoping? I mean, I’m not in those kinds of conversations, but I’m asking, like, you know, what happens? And they’re like, ‘Well, Rashida, we’re trying to figure it out ourselves because this is uncharted territory,’” she continued. “No, I’m telling you that they’re trying to be like, ‘Well, where are we going to put them? Where are we going to hold them?’ No, I mean those are the kinds of things they’re trying to tread carefully.”

Accordingly, in an escalating effort to force White House officials comply with congressional subpoenas, House Democrats have reportedly been reexamining holding those members of the administration in inherent contempt — a power that the legislature has not used since 1935.

The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) explains that inherent contempt is the oldest of three strategies that Congress can use to enforce subpoenas. According to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank:

“Since 1935, Congress has relied on the executive and judicial branches when people refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. This practice makes sense: if Congress cannot get the information it needs on its own authority, then it can rely on the authority of the other branches of government. However, there is another option. Instead of turning to another branch, Congress can legally imprison or fine individuals who refuse to comply.”

Tlaib incorrectly suggested that the process could be enforced by the Washington, D.C. Police Department — the procedure actually only involves the chamber that is concerned. Following a contempt citation, the individual is arrested by the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms, and subsequently brought to the floor for punishment, which may include imprisonment.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend