Democrats have been hit with several surprising twists and turns in the last couple of days in this political drama of a latest alleged sexual scandal. However, they definitely didn’t see the judgement GOP prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Dr. Ford at the hearing, was about to hand down.
Over the last two day, Americans have watched history unfold before our eyes as everyone was glued to whatever device they could get the Brett Kavanaugh/Christine Blasey Ford hearing on. The intensely emotional testimonies, grilling, and debate played out better than anything Hollywood could create, but came to a shocking delayed resolve on Friday.
A clear “winner” between the accuser and accused was supposed to be decided today at 1:30pm eastern time. It was a tight competition for the decision between Democrats and Conservatives in the Senate, despite Dr. Ford’s substantial lack in details on the allegation of sexual assault she was using against Judge Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s future, one that he’s worked his entire life to achieve a seat in the highest court in the country, was in the hands of all Senate members.
The first full day of the hearing on Thursday proved the new low our nation has come to, especially the Senate. Sexual allegations have become the “new norm” seemingly as a tactic of the lest to detail a decision they disagree with. It’s repulsive and it ruins lives. These unfounded allegations get far too much attention, only perpetuating the problem that puts democracy in peril.
The depraved antics we witnessed yesterday has ruined the reputation of a good, fair, and accomplished man, regardless if he’s ultimately appointed and exonerated, or not. His wife and children have lived through an unrcontionable ordeal that they will be reminded of with jabs and questions the rest of their lives.
This all came from a questionable woman’s vague and distant memory of a situation in which she can’t substantiate with details or verifiable facts. Even the four people she named as being there, one of which was a very close friend of hers, said they were not at the party where the alleged assault took place and have no recollection of ever being at such an event like this that Dr. Ford described.
Yet, here we are, going into another full week without a decision so the FBI can investigate the seemingly unstable woman’s non-corroborated memory of an alleged attack where she even went as far as to claim that she thought Kavanaugh might accidentally kill her.
Dr. Ford told “her truth” before the Senate Judiciary Committee and hundreds of thousands of Americans watching. But more importantly, she had to answer to Rachel Mitchell, a career sex crimes prosecutor, and seemed to come up very short and inconsistent on important questions the prosecutor hit her with.
After approximately four hours of Dr. Ford speaking and answering questions, Kavanaugh had his chance to defend his good name. Once he was done sharing his emotional and moving defense, Mitchell gave her verdict. Democrats were not happy.
Wired Sources reports the outcome of Mitchell’s shocking decision:
JUST IN: Rachel Mitchell, The career sex-crime prosecutor who questioned Dr. Ford, told lawmakers tonight that based on the evidence she heard at the hearing, she would not have prosecuted or even been able to obtain a search warrant – NYT
— Wired Sources (@WiredSources) September 28, 2018
Senator Lindsey Graham echoed the same important fact in his statements, having spent much of his life in law, including as a prosecutor. Lacking this evidence means that there’s no way of proving “probably cause” and showing reason “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that’s necessary for action against the accused.
Kavanaugh, a Constitutional judge, was not treated with the rights owed to him as an American. He was presumed guilty until proven innocent and the left wasn’t going to let him prove he was, despite nothing but a distant, and well timed, memory to go off of.
Without investigation, trial, and evidence, a woman from 36 years ago was given the pass to demolish this man and his family’s life, with the potential of rendering him unemployable as a law professor and judge, even if he didn’t make it onto the Supreme Court.
Regardless of what is ultimately decided on the Senate floor, following the FBI’s unnecessary investigation, this good man’s life will never be the same. Neither will his innocent family’s.
The man who has spent decades delivering justice was deprived that very right by Democrats who imposed what seemed to be an 11th hour plan the delay or demolish his confirmation onto the Supreme Court. Thankfully, Mitchell saw through the charade and was fair and honest, prioritized facts, details and respected the due process Kavanaugh deserves.
Ford’s confused story lacking the most important facts of when, where, proving who, and witness testimony, wouldn’t have even have a chance to hold up in court. So it shouldn’t have ever been allowed to hold up a confirmation of a Supreme Court judge. As such, Mitchell did the honorable thing of not even pressing this case since it’s simply a pointless distraction.
Democrats have reached a deep new low by either giving this claim any credence at all or creating the scandal themselves. This is a national disgrace and proof that to the left, politics are not about bettering our country, it’s about strengthening their power and perhaps their pocketbooks after doing so.
This desperation move with Dr. Ford as their tool was not ironic on timing, considering the midterm elections are right around the corner. They have the opportunity to reclaim control of Congress and have proven nothing and nobody is off limits to get to that goal.
It’s never been more important than now for Republicans or liberty-loving/anti-scandal Americans to flood the polls with our votes. Passivity in doing so only passes power to people who don’t have your best interest in mind in your pursuit of happiness.
Trending Now on Right Wing News
Newly Released Emails Confirm FBI Tried To Work Deal With State Dept To Minimize Hillary Email Scandal
The insanity never seems to end and once again the great Judicial Watch is doing Congress’ oversight job! It’s time arrests start happening.
Newly released FBI emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request confirm that James Comey’s FBI attempted to work out a quid pro quo deal with the Obama State Department to help cover up the Hillary Clinton private email server scandal just weeks before the 2016 election.
Back in October 15, 2016, Fox News first reported on the deal but full confirmation did not come until this week when the government watchdog group Judicial Watch released FBI communication related to the deal.
“FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a ‘quid pro quo’ between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News,” Herridge and Browne reported in 2016. “This is a flashing red light of potential criminality,” Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz (Utah) told Fox News at the time. “In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” he said.
Fox News reported on Monday that over two years later, the allegation that the FBI and State Department floated a “quid pro quo” deal has now been confirmed, and it originated with the FBI:
The trove of documents turned over by the FBI, in response to a lawsuit by the transparency group Judicial Watch, also included discussions by former FBI lawyer Lisa Page concerning a potential quid pro quo between the State Department and the FBI — in which the FBI would agree to effectively hide the fact that a Clinton email was classified in exchange for more legal attache positions that would benefit the FBI abroad, and allow them to send more agents to countries where the FBI’s access is ordinarily restricted.
The quid pro quo would have involved the FBI providing some other public reason for withholding the Clinton email from disclosure amid a Freedom of Information Act request, besides its classification level. There are no indications the proposed arrangement ever took place.
And, in the face of mounting criticism aimed at the FBI, the documents revealed that Comey quoted the 19th century poet Ralph Waldo Emerson by assuring his subordinates, “To be great is to be misunderstood.”
The FBI did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment on the released emails.
Read the full report via Fox News
WATCH: Trump Slams Pelosi On Wall, Kneeling NFL Players In Pre-Super Bowl Interview
In President Trump’s pre-Super Bowl interview with CBS News, he slammed Rep. Nancy Pelosi on the wall, as well as NFL players who kneel during the National Anthem. He was in fine form. He nailed Pelosi at the beginning of the interview and then took on the NFL and kneeling at the 15:40 mark. Trump also took extreme exception with those who are second-guessing his decision to pull American troops out of both Syria and Afghanistan.
In the interview, Trump also briefly discussed football. He said he would not push his son Barron to play the game, knowing the risk of long term brain injury. He also pointed out that soccer is becoming more popular as a sport.
But it’s his flaying of Pelosi that was riveting. President Trump referred to Nancy Pelosi as “very rigid” and intimated that he may sidestep Congress to get the wall built by declaring a national emergency. Rumor has it that an executive order is ready and awaiting his signature. At least Trump didn’t call Pelosi “frigid” although that certainly came to mind.
“I think that [Pelosi] was very rigid — which I would expect — but I think she is very bad for our country,” Trump told reporter Margaret Brennan. “She knows that you need a barrier. She knows that we need border security. She wanted to win a political point. I happen to think it’s very bad politics because basically, she wants open borders. She doesn’t mind human trafficking or she wouldn’t do this.”
“She can keep playing her games, but we will win. Because we have a much better issue. On a political basis, what she’s doing is — I actually think it’s bad politics, but much more importantly it’s very bad for our country,” he stated.
“You know, there have been plenty of national emergencies called,” Trump explained. “And this really is an invasion of our country by human traffickers.”
Trump wasn’t anywhere near done. She “doesn’t mind human trafficking,” Trump added, torching Pelosi very nicely.
From The Daily Wire:
“As for the kneeling NFL players, Trump believes the recent boost in NFL ratings proves he was right that anti-racism protests were souring Americans on professional football. Trump also believes he’s made progress handling some NFL players’ complaints. “A lot of people in the NFL have been calling and thanking me,” he said, referring to his part in efforts to reform the criminal justice system and grant clemency to a number of federal prisoners serving long sentences for drug crimes.
“You have to respect our flag and our country. I want that as president and I’d want that as a citizen. And I have a very good relationship. I did them a big favor in negotiating the USMCA, which is basically the replacement to NAFTA, which is one of the worst trade deals ever made,” Trump said. “And Roger Goodell, this is a dispute that has gone on for years. Roger Goodell called me and he thanked me.”
“In a final interview, which aired just before the game, Trump touted his plan to withdraw American military forces from Syria and Afghanistan, noting that the United States’ commitment to the two countries won’t be dimmed by a change in troop presence.
“We’ll come back if we have to,” Trump said.
“We have very fast airplanes, we have very good cargo planes. We can come back very quickly, and I’m not leaving,” Trump added, hammering in the possibility that American troops could easily re-deploy to the region. “We have a base in Iraq and the base is a fantastic edifice. I mean I was there recently, and I couldn’t believe the money that was spent on these massive runways. And these — I’ve rarely seen anything like it. And it’s there. And we’ll be there. And frankly, we’re hitting the caliphate from Iraq and as we slowly withdraw from Syria.”‘
This isn’t the first time President Trump has given an interview before the Super Bowl. He’s done it a number of times now. His State of the Union Address this week promises surprises but will also touch on these issues.