Connect with us

Prosecutor Blindsided Kavanaugh Accuser With Massive Legal Verdict

Published

on

Democrats have been hit with several surprising twists and turns in the last couple of days in this political drama of a latest alleged sexual scandal. However, they definitely didn’t see the judgement GOP prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Dr. Ford at the hearing, was about to hand down.

Over the last two day, Americans have watched history unfold before our eyes as everyone was glued to whatever device they could get the Brett Kavanaugh/Christine Blasey Ford hearing on. The intensely emotional testimonies, grilling, and debate played out better than anything Hollywood could create, but came to a shocking delayed resolve on Friday.

A clear “winner” between the accuser and accused was supposed to be decided today at 1:30pm eastern time. It was a tight competition for the decision between Democrats and Conservatives in the Senate, despite Dr. Ford’s substantial lack in details on the allegation of sexual assault she was using against Judge Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh’s future, one that he’s worked his entire life to achieve a seat in the highest court in the country, was in the hands of all Senate members.

The first full day of the hearing on Thursday proved the new low our nation has come to, especially the Senate. Sexual allegations have become the “new norm” seemingly as a tactic of the lest to detail a decision they disagree with. It’s repulsive and it ruins lives. These unfounded allegations get far too much attention, only perpetuating the problem that puts democracy in peril.

The depraved antics we witnessed yesterday has ruined the reputation of a good, fair, and accomplished man, regardless if he’s ultimately appointed and exonerated, or not. His wife and children have lived through an unrcontionable ordeal that they will be reminded of with jabs and questions the rest of their lives.

This all came from a questionable woman’s vague and distant memory of a situation in which she can’t substantiate with details or verifiable facts. Even the four people she named as being there, one of which was a very close friend of hers, said they were not at the party where the alleged assault took place and have no recollection of ever being at such an event like this that Dr. Ford described.

Yet, here we are, going into another full week without a decision so the FBI can investigate the seemingly unstable woman’s non-corroborated memory of an alleged attack where she even went as far as to claim that she thought Kavanaugh might accidentally kill her.

Dr. Ford told “her truth” before the Senate Judiciary Committee and hundreds of thousands of Americans watching. But more importantly, she had to answer to Rachel Mitchell, a career sex crimes prosecutor, and seemed to come up very short and inconsistent on important questions the prosecutor hit her with.

After approximately four hours of Dr. Ford speaking and answering questions, Kavanaugh had his chance to defend his good name. Once he was done sharing his emotional and moving defense, Mitchell gave her verdict. Democrats were not happy.

Wired Sources reports the outcome of Mitchell’s shocking decision:

https://twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1045506984378863616

Senator Lindsey Graham echoed the same important fact in his statements, having spent much of his life in law, including as a prosecutor. Lacking this evidence means that there’s no way of proving “probably cause” and showing reason “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that’s necessary for action against the accused.

Kavanaugh, a Constitutional judge, was not treated with the rights owed to him as an American. He was presumed guilty until proven innocent and the left wasn’t going to let him prove he was, despite nothing but a distant, and well timed, memory to go off of.

Without investigation, trial, and evidence, a woman from 36 years ago was given the pass to demolish this man and his family’s life, with the potential of rendering him unemployable as a law professor and judge, even if he didn’t make it onto the Supreme Court.

Regardless of what is ultimately decided on the Senate floor, following the FBI’s unnecessary investigation, this good man’s life will never be the same. Neither will his innocent family’s.

The man who has spent decades delivering justice was deprived that very right by Democrats who imposed what seemed to be an 11th hour plan the delay or demolish his confirmation onto the Supreme Court. Thankfully, Mitchell saw through the charade and was fair and honest, prioritized facts, details and respected the due process Kavanaugh deserves.

Ford’s confused story lacking the most important facts of when, where, proving who, and witness testimony, wouldn’t have even have a chance to hold up in court. So it shouldn’t have ever been allowed to hold up a confirmation of a Supreme Court judge. As such, Mitchell did the honorable thing of not even pressing this case since it’s simply a pointless distraction.

Democrats have reached a deep new low by either giving this claim any credence at all or creating the scandal themselves. This is a national disgrace and proof that to the left, politics are not about bettering our country, it’s about strengthening their power and perhaps their pocketbooks after doing so.

This desperation move with Dr. Ford as their tool was not ironic on timing, considering the midterm elections are right around the corner. They have the opportunity to reclaim control of Congress and have proven nothing and nobody is off limits to get to that goal.

It’s never been more important than now for Republicans or liberty-loving/anti-scandal Americans to flood the polls with our votes. Passivity in doing so only passes power to people who don’t have your best interest in mind in your pursuit of happiness.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Trending Now on Right Wing News


Ocasio: ‘I Was Joking About The World Ending In 12 Years’

Published

on

Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is now claiming that she was only joking when she said that because of climate change the world will end in twelve years. In fact, she says everyone with two brain cells knows she was only kidding. Except of course all the kids who became activists because of her videos on the subject and her repeated charge that it was indeed true.

The young socialist proceeded to mock the Republican Party for taking her claim about the end of the world seriously, which she suggested was a combination of “dry humor + sarcasm.” Right… it fell flat so now she is trying to pretend she never meant it. Typical. “This is a technique of the GOP, to take dry humor + sarcasm literally and ‘fact check’ it. Like the ‘world ending in 12 years’ thing, you’d have to have the social intelligence of a sea sponge to think it’s literal. But the GOP is basically Dwight from The Office so who knows,” wrote AOC in a tweet published on Mother’s Day. Evidently, she believes all her acolytes are idiots for believing her.

Ocasio-Cortez first addressed the topic back in January at a Martin Luther King forum in New York City. At the time, she was not joking when she said it either. Those in attendance gave her a roaring round of applause and then she emphasized the point by calling the fight against climate change “our World War II.”

“I think the part of it that is generational is that millennials and people, in Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we’re like, the world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change,” stated Ocasio-Cortez. “And your biggest issue, your biggest issue is how are going to pay for it? — and like this is the war, this is our World War II.”

Not only has Ocasio-Cortez repeated her apocalyptic climate change vision over and over again… she has collaborated with The Intercept to create a video centered around the claim. “Climate change is here + we’ve got a deadline: 12 years left to cut emissions in half,” she captioned a tweet promoting the video last month.

The video was entitled: “A Message From the Future with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,” and it pictured a future where AOC’s widely-panned and uber-expensive Green New Deal has inspired action to save the planet. In the video, she again says that we have a “12-year deadline.”

The Daily Wire reported at the time:

“The congresswoman then warns that we have “twelve years to change everything” before “hundreds of millions of people would be more likely to face food and water shortages, poverty, and death.”

“Twelve years to change everything,” she narrates. “How we got around, how we fed ourselves, how we made our stuff, how we lived and worked — everything. The only way to do it was to transform our economy, which we already knew was broken.”’

More from The Daily Wire:

“Moreover, as reported by The Washington Free Beacon, Ocasio-Cortez doubled-down on her 12-year declaration during an Instagram live-stream when a viewer mocked her over the claim.

“We have twelve years left to cut emissions by at least 50 percent if not more,” Ocasio-Cortez, visibly annoyed, told her viewers. “For everyone who wants to make a joke about that, you may laugh, but you’re grandkids will not, so understand that the internet documents everything.”

“She then went on a tangent about looking back in history books of the civil rights movement and seeing the white people holding signs against allowing black people to vote,” the Beacon noted.

“They would hold up these bigoted signs and they would hold up signs that said things like ‘What about white rights?’ and all of this stuff in the 1950s and 1960s, so just know that in the present day there are a lot of people who hide the fact that their families and that their grandparents fought against principles of equal rights in the United States, not 100 years ago, not 80 years ago, but in this generation’s lifetime,” said the elected rep.

“While a lot of people can hide that their grandparents did that in the civil rights movement, you should also know that the internet documents everything and your grandchildren will not be able to hide the fact that you fought against acknowledging and taking bold actions on climate change,” Ocasio-Cortez continued. “People who are trying to mock and delay this moment, I mean—I just feel bad for you. I just pity you for your role in history right now.”‘

Ocasio-Cortez was not kidding when she made her claim. She got many young people and activists to join her in her ‘the sky is falling’ mantra… New York Mayor Bill de Blasio is among them. Virtually every 2020 Democratic contender supports her Green New Deal and her claim of global doom. So, she just called all of them morons as well.

She wasn’t joking when she made her claim but she was lying just as she is now. Perhaps Nancy Pelosi whispered in her ear that if she values her political career that she should tone it down and back off of this climate nonsense. It’s right out of the Democratic playbook.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Kamala Harris: I Will Take Gun Dealers’ Licenses Away With Executive Action If Elected

Published

on

Sen. Kamala Harris is once again vowing that she will use executive powers to enact gun control measures if Congress fails to act in the first 100 days of her presidential administration. That’s breathtakingly unconstitutional and all but tanks her chances in a presidential bid. We may have literally just dodged a Second Amendment bullet because of her arrogance.

“I’m proposing, one, that if by my 100th day in office when elected president of the United States, if the United States Congress fails to put a bill on my desk … then I’m prepared to take executive action because that’s what’s needed: action,” Harris, a California Democrat, and 2020 hopeful, said in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper.

The first time Harris voiced her intentions on the issue was at a CNN town hall in late April. But she reiterated it on Sunday after yet another school shooting. This one involved a transgender shooter with an illegal immigrant felon for a father and a young hero… 18-year-old Kendrick Castillo who was killed after rushing the gunman to save his classmates.

“We are not waiting on tragedies and we are not waiting on good ideas,” Harris said, pointing to the “heroism of a child who we now mourn his loss, his parents’ only child.” I’m surprised she didn’t attack ‘thoughts and prayers’ as well here. Castillo’s parents probably hate her using their deceased son as a political pawn – his fellow students walked out of a vigil because of that same offense involving Colorado Democratic politicians.

From The New York Post:

“When asked how she liked Sen. Cory Booker’s (D-N.J.) proposal for a federal gun registry she answered, “I like the idea. But, Jake, I’m going to tell you, on the issue of the need for gun safety laws, we’re not at any loss for good ideas. People have been having good ideas for decades on this issue.”

“Booker is also vying for the White House.

“Harris said that the country was waiting for Congress to act.

“If she was forced to take executive action, Harris said she would require those who sell more than five guns a year to do background checks.

“She would also have the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives take away licenses from gun dealers that don’t follow the law.

“Harris also expressed support for government intervention in dealing with Facebook. Co-founder Chris Hughes said Thursday that the social network should be broken up.

“Asked by Tapper if she agreed with Hughes, Harris answered, “yes, I think we have to seriously take a look at that, yes.”

“I mean, when you look at the issue, they’re essentially a utility. Like, there are very few people that can actually get by and be involved in their communities or society or in whatever their profession without somehow, somewhere using Facebook,” Harris said. “It’s very difficult for people to be engaged in any level of commerce without – so, we have to recognize it for what it is. It is essentially a utility that has gone unregulated. And as far as I’m concerned, that’s got to stop.”’

Harris also tried to walk back that she wanted to do away with private health insurance. She explained that while she supported Medicare-for-all “it doesn’t get rid of all insurance.” “It was in the context of saying, let’s get rid of all the bureaucracy. Let’s get rid of all the waste,” she said concerning her previous remark.

Harris said the Medicare-for-all bill she supports “doesn’t get rid of supplemental insurance.” That bill would also give healthcare services to illegal immigrants. Tapper asked if this meant Harris supported giving healthcare to illegal immigrants. “Let me just be very clear about this. I’m opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety, public education or public health, period,” Harris answered.

And she figures taking away guns and the license to sell them is in the interest of public health evidently. The woman simply cannot open her trap without lying and trying to take away our constitutional freedoms.

DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Latest Articles

[ifform list="4174" submit="Subscribe"]

Send this to a friend