Wow, the mask is really slipping on socialist Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. During a CNN town hall debate, he actually had the stones to come out and say that taxpayers should fund abortions in poor countries in response to whether he supports population control. Not only is the woman asking this all-in for it but Sanders is as well – their demeanor is simply horrifying.
Martha Readyoff, identified by CNN as a teacher, said to Sanders: “Human population growth has more than doubled in the last 50 years, the planet cannot sustain this growth.” This is a teacher, y’all… a TEACHER! “Empowering women, and educating everyone on the need to curb population growth seems a reasonable campaign to enact,” Readyoff continued. “Would you be courageous enough to discuss this issue and make it a key feature of a plan to address climate catastrophe?”
“The answer’s ‘yes,'” Bernie unequivocally stated. “Women in the United States of Americas, by the way, have a right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions.”
“And the Mexico City agreement — which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control — to me is totally absurd,” Sanders continued. “So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, it’s something I very strongly support.”
Bernie Sanders wants to take taxpayer money and use it to fund abortions in "poor countries" to fight climate change pic.twitter.com/DDSq9PacgB
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) September 5, 2019
In my book, population control is just a fancy way of saying ‘eugenics’. This is where socialism and communism always lead… to the death of innocents.
The Mexico City agreement Sanders referred to is a policy that prohibits U.S. taxpayer dollars from being used by foreign organizations to fund abortion services in other countries. It was put in place by President Ronald Reagan in 1984 — and according to The Atlantic, has been repealed and reinstated several times. President Trump reinstated the policy in January of 2017.
Democrat Voter: There are too many humans on earth.
Bernie: I agree. We need to fund abortions to poor, third world countries.
This is absolutely horrifying. pic.twitter.com/B2SBT053mz
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 5, 2019
In a perfect example of ‘the argument is never the argument’, the fight for climate change among these Marxists is really not about climate change in the least. It’s about power and control… it’s about eugenics and reconfiguring the voting demographic. It’s about corruption and wealth redistribution — not to the poor but to the elite. Bernie Sanders is the poster boy for all of this and Al Gore, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, and a legion of other leftists are pushing this as if their lives depend on it because they do. If you can’t control the flow of money, power, and people, you can’t rule from on high.
All of the major Democratic candidates have expressed support for abortion rights, but none have tied abortion to climate change or discussed it as a means of population control. That just changed with Bernie Sanders and it will now become a leftist precedent. In their minds, everything is tied to climate change because that’s where the money is.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW:
Trending Now on Right Wing News
Steve Bannon’s Back And His New Show Is On FIRE! DEMS FREAK OUT!
Stephen K. Bannon, Jason Miller, and Raheem Kassam are joined by guest Rep. Matt Gaetz on their daily show which you can watch live or past shows. It airs daily from 9am-10am EST every single day! www.WarRoom.org
at 23:14 Congressman Gaetz comes live on the show and drops bombs on democrats.
The hosts discuss if “all roads lead to [John] Bolton”, as well as the new White House “informal” war room, the Jim Jordan letter about Saturday depositions, the Graham-McConnell resolution condemning the Democrat’s secretive impeachment inquiry.
Was the resolution watered down, and why?
Matt Gaetz sheds more light on his “storming of the SCIF”, as well as how the MAGA movement needs the “killer class” of 2016 Trump campaign operatives back on the front lines.
VIDEO: Rashida Tlaib: Dems Discussing Arresting Trump Officials
It’s crystal clear..that the left should never ever be allowed into our government. These are dangerous folks.
Maybe Rashida should be arrested for her connections to Islamic terrorists. The fact that this woman is in our government…is despicable!
Via The Daily Wire:
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) stated on Tuesday that House Democrats were discussing behind closed doors how to arrest the members of President Donald Trump’s administration who did not comply with congressional subpoenas.
“Let me tell you, this is pretty — and this is the last caucus conversation we had. Do you know this is really unprecedented? This is the worst time we’ve ever had a situation like this,” Tlaib said during a town hall meeting. “So they’re trying to figure out — no joke — they’re trying to figure out, ‘Well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them?’ No, no.”
“What are we hoping? I mean, I’m not in those kinds of conversations, but I’m asking, like, you know, what happens? And they’re like, ‘Well, Rashida, we’re trying to figure it out ourselves because this is uncharted territory,’” she continued. “No, I’m telling you that they’re trying to be like, ‘Well, where are we going to put them? Where are we going to hold them?’ No, I mean those are the kinds of things they’re trying to tread carefully.”
— America Rising (@AmericaRising) October 4, 2019
Accordingly, in an escalating effort to force White House officials comply with congressional subpoenas, House Democrats have reportedly been reexamining holding those members of the administration in inherent contempt — a power that the legislature has not used since 1935.
The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) explains that inherent contempt is the oldest of three strategies that Congress can use to enforce subpoenas. According to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank:
“Since 1935, Congress has relied on the executive and judicial branches when people refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas. This practice makes sense: if Congress cannot get the information it needs on its own authority, then it can rely on the authority of the other branches of government. However, there is another option. Instead of turning to another branch, Congress can legally imprison or fine individuals who refuse to comply.”
Tlaib incorrectly suggested that the process could be enforced by the Washington, D.C. Police Department — the procedure actually only involves the chamber that is concerned. Following a contempt citation, the individual is arrested by the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms, and subsequently brought to the floor for punishment, which may include imprisonment.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW: