My, how the tables are turning now. It’s heartening to watch. Attorney General William Barr has just appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if intelligence collection efforts targeting the Trump campaign were “lawful and appropriate.” John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, is highly respected and is sure to find dirt that may eventually lead to a special prosecutor. Or, at least, one can hope.
This move by Trump comes as his administration is pushing for answers on why federal authorities conducted the surveillance, to begin with, as well as whether Democrats were the ones who improperly colluded with foreign actors… that would be the Russians. We all know they did. Now, it has to be proven and there is more than enough evidence to do so if Durham is willing.
Rumor has it that Barr is “serious” and that is why he assigned DOJ personnel to the probe. Durham is known as a “hard-charging, bulldog” prosecutor, Fox News was told. Sounds like my kind of guy. The focus of the impending probe includes the pre-transition period prior to Nov. 7, 2016. That includes the use and initiation of informants, as well as potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses. Carter Page anyone?
From Fox News:
“An informant working for U.S. intelligence posed as a Cambridge University research assistant in September 2016 to try extracting any possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia from George Papadopoulos, then a Trump foreign policy adviser, it emerged earlier this month. Papadopoulos told Fox News the informant tried to “seduce” him as part of the “bizarre” episode.
“Durham previously has investigated law enforcement corruption, the destruction of CIA videotapes and the Boston FBI office’s relationship with mobsters. He is set to continue to serve as the chief federal prosecutor in Connecticut.
“In January, House Republican Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows wrote to Durham seeking a briefing, saying they had “discovered” that Durham’s office was “investigating former FBI General Counsel James Baker” for unauthorized disclosures to the media.”
“Durham’s new review would exist alongside the ongoing probe by DOJ Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz, who is continuing to review potential surveillance abuses by the FBI — an investigation that began last March and that Fox News is told is nearing completion.
“Republicans also have been looking for answers from U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber, who was appointed a year ago by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to review not only surveillance abuses by the FBI and DOJ but also authorities’ handling of the probe into the Clinton Foundation.
“Huber, Republicans have cautioned, apparently has made little progress and has spoken to few key witnesses and whistleblowers. But, in January, then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker reportedly indicated at a private meeting that Huber’s work was continuing apace.
“Durham’s appointment comes about a month after Barr told members of Congress he believed “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign in 2016. He later said he didn’t mean anything pejorative and was gathering a team to look into the origins of the special counsel’s investigation.”
John Durham is an outstanding choice for special prosecutor investigating 2016 pre-election activities—his selection further demonstrates Bill Barr’s tenacity and determined desire to get to the truth and restore credibility at the top tier of the DOJ and FBI.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) May 14, 2019
The Democrats have been in a snit over Barr ever since Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report came out and said that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russian actors, despite numerous offers by Russians to assist the campaign. The left has continually threatened Barr with contempt, arrest, and hefty fines. He’s basically told them to stuff it where the sun doesn’t shine.
More from Fox News:
“In obtaining a secret FISA warrant to surveil former Trump aide Carter Page, the FBI copy-pasted directly from a disputed Washington Post opinion article to suggest the Trump campaign may have been compromised. The bureau also repeatedly assured the court that it “did not believe” British ex-spy Christopher Steele was the direct source for a Yahoo News article implicating Page in Russian collusion.
“But, London court records showed that contrary to the FBI’s assessments, Steele briefed Yahoo News and other reporters in the fall of 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS — the opposition research firm behind the dossier. Fusion GPS was retained by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee (DNC), a piece of information not stated in the FISA application.
“The FISA application cribbed word-for-word from the Washington Post article that claimed the Trump campaign had “worked behind the scenes” to “gut” the GOP platform on Russia and Ukraine. The FBI apparently did not conduct its own independent assessment of the piece, which was labeled an “opinion” column by the Post, and Mueller’s probe ultimately found no wrongdoing by the Trump team.
“Additionally, internal FBI text messages exclusively obtained by Fox News earlier this year showed that a senior DOJ official raised concerns about the bias in a key FISA warrant, but that FBI officials pressed on.
“There’s a document that’s classified that I’m gonna try to get unclassified that takes the dossier — all the pages of it — and it has verification to one side,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” this weekend. “There really is no verification, other than media reports that were generated by reporters that received the dossier.”
“Graham specifically cited the report from The Hill’s John Solomon that the FBI was expressly told that Steele, the bureau’s confidential informant, had admitted to a contact at the State Department that he was “keen” to leak his discredited dossier for purposes of influencing the 2016 election.
“Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s written account of her Oct. 11, 2016, meeting with Steele was apparently sent to the FBI, according to records unearthed in a transparency lawsuit by Citizens United.”
Connecticut Democratic Senators @SenBlumenthal & @ChrisMurphyCT in 2017 on John Durham US Atty for CT nomination:"We are confident that Durham will continue this record of success in providing strong leadership to the office." The Senators recommended Durham to President Trump. pic.twitter.com/fMY7o1LNWi
— Craig Caplan (@CraigCaplan) May 14, 2019
“I am reviewing the conduct of the investigation and trying to get my arms around all the aspects of the counterintelligence investigation that was conducted during the summer of 2016,” Barr said during a congressional hearing in April. And so he is.
Courtesy of Sara Carter, a little background on Durham:
“John Henry Durham (born 1950) is the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut. He is best known for leading an inquiry into allegations that FBI agents and Boston police had ties with the mob and his appointment as special prosecutor regarding the 2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction. On November 1, 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to be Connecticut’s next U.S. Attorney. On February 15, 2018, his nomination to be the United States Attorney was confirmed by voice vote. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018.”
In nominating Durham, the White House said he and other nominees for U.S. attorney jobs share Trump’s vision for “making America safe again.” Looks like that includes bringing the Democrats screaming into the light after trying to conduct a secret coup on a sitting President of the United States.
DONATE NOW TO BUILD THE WALL WITH BRIAN KOLFAGE, CLICK BELOW: